2016
DOI: 10.1161/circresaha.115.306247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imaging Atherosclerosis

Abstract: Advances in atherosclerosis imaging technology and research have provided a range of diagnostic tools to characterize high-risk plaque in vivo; however, these important vascular imaging methods additionally promise great scientific and translational applications beyond this quest. When combined with conventional anatomic- and hemodynamic-based assessments of disease severity, cross-sectional multimodal imaging incorporating molecular probes and other novel noninvasive techniques can add detailed interrogation … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
217
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 218 publications
(221 citation statements)
references
References 210 publications
(209 reference statements)
1
217
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Screening tests lack sensitivity and specificity; diagnostic tests are expensive, toxic, dangerous and cumbersome and therapies are essentially without important effect and with significant toxicities [58]. Thus have we dealt with the biggest challenge of our time in medicine.…”
Section: Nnh: Unknownmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Screening tests lack sensitivity and specificity; diagnostic tests are expensive, toxic, dangerous and cumbersome and therapies are essentially without important effect and with significant toxicities [58]. Thus have we dealt with the biggest challenge of our time in medicine.…”
Section: Nnh: Unknownmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 The determination of plaque composition with the use of CCTA can be challenging due to the influence of various factors, including the size of the necrotic area, the lumen thickness, the density of the intraluminal contrast medium, slice thickness, and reconstruction filters. 21 One of the most important advantages of coronary MR angiography over cardiac CT is that it does not expose the examined subject to radiations. A study proved that CCTA is not very accurate in diagnosing heavily calcified plaques.…”
Section: Cmr Versus Msct Coronary Angiographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another important advantage of CMR is the lack of using contrast agents. 21,22 CONCLUsIONs Even if invasive coronary angiography is one of the most accurate methods for the diagnosis and treatment of myocardial infarction, in some occasions it cannot provide complete information to sustain the diagnosis. In these situations, the role of modern noninvasive techniques, such as CCTA and CMR, is highly important.…”
Section: Cmr Versus Msct Coronary Angiographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Targets include vascular cell adhesion molecules, metalloproteinases, natriuretic peptide clearance receptors, and, most recently, chemokine receptors. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Some of these targeted radiotracers have been translated for human atherosclerosis imaging. 13,14 Wei and colleagues in their article in this issue of Journal of Nuclear Cardiology have developed a single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) radiotracer that targets the chemokine receptor CCR5.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%