2006
DOI: 10.1109/tdmr.2006.876605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imaging and Dopant Profiling of Silicon Carbide Devices by Secondary Electron Dopant Contrast

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5a shows the MC simulation of the signal acquired in a silicon PN junction at a PE energy of 0.5 keV. As already confirmed by previous experimental measurements [1], the p-type doped anode exhibits a SE yield, which exceeds the SE yield of the cathode, as well as the SE yield of the n-typed doped cathode. Fig.…”
Section: Dependency On the Barrier Height Sepc Mapssupporting
confidence: 73%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…5a shows the MC simulation of the signal acquired in a silicon PN junction at a PE energy of 0.5 keV. As already confirmed by previous experimental measurements [1], the p-type doped anode exhibits a SE yield, which exceeds the SE yield of the cathode, as well as the SE yield of the n-typed doped cathode. Fig.…”
Section: Dependency On the Barrier Height Sepc Mapssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…In both cases, the SEPC is due to the dependence of the SE yield on the local surface potential related to the local carrier density, and finally to the macroscopic doping concentration [1]. Theoretically, a contrast could also arise due to energy dependence of the emerging angles of the SE.…”
Section: Sepc and Dopingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The benefits for SEPC deriving from the operation at low acceleration voltages have been already discussed in a previous work [4]. Among these, the fact that finest sample details can be resolved and that the charging effects are minimized.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 89%