2013
DOI: 10.1080/01443410.2013.813689
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imagination and creativity: wellsprings and streams of education – the Taiwan experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Posteriormente, diversos autores varían estas dimensiones eliminando algunas y/o incluyendo otras nuevas como variedad, inventiva, apertura, redefinición… (De la Torre, 2000), divergencia (Johnson, 1977;Cleland y Gallahue, 1993;Cleland, 1994), predisposición al riesgo y a la complejidad (Sherrill, 1983) o imaginación (Sherrill, 1983;Torrance, 1981). En la elaboración del presente instrumento se decidió incluir tres dimensiones clásicas de la creatividad (fluidez, flexibilidad y originalidad) por estar presentes en casi la totalidad de los instrumentos de evaluación de la creatividad motriz (Bertsch, 1983;Brennan, 1983;De la Torre, 2000;Doddos, 1973;Domínguez et al, 2014;Glover;Sherrill, 1983;Sherrill, Lubin y Routon, 1979) y de la creatividad general (De la Torre y Violant, 2006), y una cuarta, imaginación, asimismo presente en diversos instrumentos de evaluación de la creatividad motriz (Sherrill, 1983;Torrance, 1981) y de la creatividad (De la Torre y Violant, 2006), al existir una estrecha vinculación entre imaginación y creatividad (Wu y Albanese, 2013).…”
Section: Dimensiones De La Creatividad Motrizunclassified
“…Posteriormente, diversos autores varían estas dimensiones eliminando algunas y/o incluyendo otras nuevas como variedad, inventiva, apertura, redefinición… (De la Torre, 2000), divergencia (Johnson, 1977;Cleland y Gallahue, 1993;Cleland, 1994), predisposición al riesgo y a la complejidad (Sherrill, 1983) o imaginación (Sherrill, 1983;Torrance, 1981). En la elaboración del presente instrumento se decidió incluir tres dimensiones clásicas de la creatividad (fluidez, flexibilidad y originalidad) por estar presentes en casi la totalidad de los instrumentos de evaluación de la creatividad motriz (Bertsch, 1983;Brennan, 1983;De la Torre, 2000;Doddos, 1973;Domínguez et al, 2014;Glover;Sherrill, 1983;Sherrill, Lubin y Routon, 1979) y de la creatividad general (De la Torre y Violant, 2006), y una cuarta, imaginación, asimismo presente en diversos instrumentos de evaluación de la creatividad motriz (Sherrill, 1983;Torrance, 1981) y de la creatividad (De la Torre y Violant, 2006), al existir una estrecha vinculación entre imaginación y creatividad (Wu y Albanese, 2013).…”
Section: Dimensiones De La Creatividad Motrizunclassified
“…The Finally, the stage of transformation (Wu, 2013) is most notable for an emerging association of GATE with creative education, as seen in the preliminary research for the White Paper on Creative Education and subsequent action plans (Wu & Albanese, 2013), which emphasised a need for pedagogical change to harness universal creative potential. Further, the Special Education Act was amended in 2009, as arts education became the purview of the Arts Education Act rather than a part of gifted education (Wu, 2013).…”
Section: Formal Giftedness and Talent Education In Taiwanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the overviews of formal giftedness education referenced above and found in policy papers, we identify several key features reflecting the sociocultural understanding of GATE in Taiwan developed in this chapter. These include (a) a persistent focus on merit ('credentialism'; Wu & Kuo, 2016, p. 46) and traditional intellectual and academic skills, despite adoption of policy language covering diverse areas (Wu & Kuo, 2016); (b) policy with broadly interpretable definitions of giftedness, with 'giftedness in other special abilities' evolving to include skills in sports, games and computers (Ministry of Education, 2009); (c) incremental implementation with pilot programs (Wu, 2013); (d) stated intention to leverage efforts in gifted education to reach everyone in the education system, such as with policies calling for promotion of flexible, student-centred learning (K-12 Education Administration, 2015) or expansion of creative education (Wu & Albanese, 2013); and (e) the conjunction of giftedness, creativity and talent in later policy and practice (Ministry of Education, 2009.…”
Section: Formal Giftedness and Talent Education In Taiwanmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CEPAL, 2011 ; UNESCO, 1998 ), as well as recent research (e.g. Hammershøj, 2014 ; Karwowski, Gralewski, Lebuda, & Wiśniewska, 2007 ; Likeschová & Tichá, 2013 ; Salakhatdinova & Palei, 2015 ; Santamaría & Sánchez, 2012 ; Sawyer, 2006 ; Wu & Albanese, 2013 ) highlight the role of creative skills in the academic milieu, stressing the importance of research on the concept, facing the design of teaching programs to enhance learning processes. The relevance of creativity in higher education stands out considering future outcomes in professional life once a degree is obtained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%