2016
DOI: 10.1017/s147474801500047x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Images of Quantum Representations of Mapping Class Groups and Dupont–guichardet–wigner Quasi-Homomorphisms

Abstract: International audienceWe prove that either the images of the mapping class groups by quantum representations are not isomorphic to higher rank lattices or else the kernels have a large number of normal generators. Further, we show that the images of the mapping class groups have non-trivial 2-cohomology, at least for small levels. For this purpose, we considered a series of quasi-homomorphisms on mapping class groups extending the previous work of Barge and Ghys (Math. Ann. 294 (1992), 235–265) and of Gambaudo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [17], Pitsch and the second author used quantum topological techniques to prove that Mod g / Mod g [p] is not commensurable to a higher rank lattice whenever g 4 and p 2g − 1.…”
Section: Non-lattice Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [17], Pitsch and the second author used quantum topological techniques to prove that Mod g / Mod g [p] is not commensurable to a higher rank lattice whenever g 4 and p 2g − 1.…”
Section: Non-lattice Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In , Pitsch and the second author used quantum topological techniques to prove that prefixModg/prefixModgfalse[pfalse] is not commensurable to a higher rank lattice whenever g4 and p2g1. The first purpose of this note is to give the following uniform version of this result, in the case of once‐punctured surfaces: Theorem Let g,p2, where p4 if g=2, and p{2,3,4,6,8,12} if g3.…”
Section: Introduction and Statementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally notice that G g,p,(p−3) contains G g−1,p as a subgroup. In particular, for g ≥ 4 each noncompact factor has rank at least 2, by [12]. We can follow the proof of this result in [12] for i = 0 to obtain the result for g = 3 as well.…”
Section: Quantum Surface Group Representationsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Since Γ 1 g is perfect when g ≥ 3 and of order 10 for g = 2, it follows that ρ p,(i) ( Γ 1 g ) is contained within the special unitary group SU g,p,ζ,(i) , if (g, p) = (2, 5), as in [5,11,12].…”
Section: Quantum Surface Group Representationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation