2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00220-018-3126-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Profinite Completions of Burnside-Type Quotients of Surface Groups

Abstract: Using quantum representations of mapping class groups we prove that profinite completions of Burnside-type surface group quotients are not virtually prosolvable, in general. Further, we construct infinitely many finite simple characteristic quotients of surface groups.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We first explain how to construct the group Q1 from the statement. First, there exists h1π1false(Sgfalse) of infinite order in prefixModg1/prefixModg1false[pfalse]: this is a consequence of work by Koberda–Santharoubane [, Theorem 4.1] for large p, and Funar–Lochak [, Proof of Proposition 3.2] for all p as in the hypotheses of Theorem . We are going to produce an injective homomorphism prefixModg1prefixModg1 as in Lemma , suited to this element h1.…”
Section: Normal Subgroups Via Coversmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We first explain how to construct the group Q1 from the statement. First, there exists h1π1false(Sgfalse) of infinite order in prefixModg1/prefixModg1false[pfalse]: this is a consequence of work by Koberda–Santharoubane [, Theorem 4.1] for large p, and Funar–Lochak [, Proof of Proposition 3.2] for all p as in the hypotheses of Theorem . We are going to produce an injective homomorphism prefixModg1prefixModg1 as in Lemma , suited to this element h1.…”
Section: Normal Subgroups Via Coversmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof. When i 1 = 2 this is the main result of ( [36], Thm.4.1) noting that their proof works for all p ≥ 5 not only for large enough p. For other values of i 1 = 0 this is contained in the proof of ( [25], Prop. 3.2, see also [24]).…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The last item follows by observing that the proof given in [36] for i 1 = 2, can be adapted without any change to even p (see [25]).…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Eventually we should note that the results obtained above for Γ g could in principle be extended to Γ r g,k . The case of Γ 1 g was first considered by Koberda-Santharoubane ( [42]) and further in [32,21]. In particular we have linear algebraic groups U 1 g,p , playing the role of U p and projective representations ρ p : Γ 1 g → P U 1 g,p .…”
Section: Quantum Representationsmentioning
confidence: 99%