2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-018-6192-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Image retrieval based on effective feature extraction and diffusion process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be seen that the proposed work performs better than the identified existing approaches. The [74] Gabor Histogram 41.30 Yu et al [75] Image-based HOG-LBP 46.00 Deselaers et al [74] LF-SIFT Histogram 48.20 Hamreras and Bucheham [76] RICE Algorithm selection model 49.72 Deselaers et al [74] Color histogram 50.50 Srivastava et al [77] Moments of LTP 53.70 Kumar and Nagarajan [51] LCP 78.30 Mohiuddin et al [68] CCV + LBP 82.52 Srivastava and Khare [78] DWT + SURF + GLCM 84.97 Pardede et al [79] Low-level features + relevance feedback 85.59 Srivastava and Khare [49] MS-LBP (7 Thus, the proposed technique surpasses over the literature of Xia et al [48], Srivastava et al [73,77,80], Vipparthi and Nagar [52], Srivastava and Khare [49], Zhou et al [69], Verma et al [81], Zhou et al [71], and Mohiuddin et al [68], as shown in Table 4.…”
Section: Performance On Corel-5kmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can be seen that the proposed work performs better than the identified existing approaches. The [74] Gabor Histogram 41.30 Yu et al [75] Image-based HOG-LBP 46.00 Deselaers et al [74] LF-SIFT Histogram 48.20 Hamreras and Bucheham [76] RICE Algorithm selection model 49.72 Deselaers et al [74] Color histogram 50.50 Srivastava et al [77] Moments of LTP 53.70 Kumar and Nagarajan [51] LCP 78.30 Mohiuddin et al [68] CCV + LBP 82.52 Srivastava and Khare [78] DWT + SURF + GLCM 84.97 Pardede et al [79] Low-level features + relevance feedback 85.59 Srivastava and Khare [49] MS-LBP (7 Thus, the proposed technique surpasses over the literature of Xia et al [48], Srivastava et al [73,77,80], Vipparthi and Nagar [52], Srivastava and Khare [49], Zhou et al [69], Verma et al [81], Zhou et al [71], and Mohiuddin et al [68], as shown in Table 4.…”
Section: Performance On Corel-5kmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The ARP performance story over Corel-10k dataset can be summarized as follow: it overshadows color moments [73] by 41.34%, moments of wavelet transform [80] by [67] DCD + wavelet + curvelet 76.50 Mohiuddin et al [68] CCV + LBP 76.60 Zhou et al [69] CH + LDP 78.31 Zhou et al [70] SGLCM + 2D-CS model 80.10 Zhou et al [71] CH + LDP +SIFTBOF 85.10 Pradhan et al [72] Adaptive…”
Section: Performance On Corel-10kmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feature extraction is the process in which the features are extracted from the input data and transferred into a set of features, splitting the accurate data from the massive set of databases and retrieving the appropriate and revealing features (also known as dimensionality reduction). In this stage, the image features (texture and color) are extracted [23].…”
Section: Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the retrieval system has better performance, the curve is as far from the origin of coordinates as possible. The area between the curve and the X-Y axes should be larger, which is usually measured and is approximate to MAP [42]. In other words, the most common way to summarize the P-R curve in one value is P-R. P-R is the mean of the average precision (AP) scores of all queries and is computed as follows:…”
Section: Mean Average Precision (Map)mentioning
confidence: 99%