Image quality metrics for the evaluation of print quality

Abstract

Image quality metrics have become more and more popular in the image processing community. However, so far, no one has been able to define an image quality metric well correlated with the percept for overall image quality. One of the causes is that image quality is multi-dimensional and complex. One approach to bridge the gap between perceived and calculated image quality is to reduce the complexity of image quality, by breaking the overall quality into a set of quality attributes. In our research we have presented a set of quality attributes built on existing attributes from the literature. The six proposed quality attributes are: sharpness, color, lightness, artifacts, contrast, and physical. This set keeps the dimensionality to a minimum. An experiment validated the quality attributes as suitable for image quality evaluation. The process of applying image quality metrics to printed images is not straightforward, because image quality metrics require a digital input. A framework has been developed for this process, which includes scanning the print to get a digital copy, image registration, and the application of image quality metrics. With quality attributes for the evaluation of image quality and a framework for applying image quality metrics, a selection of suitable image quality metrics for the different quality attributes has been carried out. Each of the quality attributes has been investigated, and an experimental analysis carried out to find the most suitable image quality metrics for the given quality attributes. For the many attributes metrics based on structural similarity are the the most suitable, while for other attributes further evaluation is required.

Assessing the chromatic contrast in open surface excavations: a comparative study between subjective and quantitative approaches

“…This is known as the RMS value, in engineering, which is the square root of the MSE. The latter calculates the cumulative squared error between the original image and the distorted image, as follows [25]:…”

Using metrics to assess the ICC perceptual rendering intent

“…The choice of sub-aspects came from Pedersen et al 10 Since the printer platform remained the same for the three reproductions and smoothness is addressed with the objective aspect list, we have eliminated artifacts and Figure 6. The objective metrics have been scaled, split into two groups, and plotted.…”

“…The subjective testing is divided by preference aspects: overall, color, contrast, lightness, and sharpness. 10 A set of IQMs are chosen to test the performance of each of these subjective-aspects (sub-aspects). The sub-aspects are evaluated with a set of psychometric tests.…”

Evaluation of image quality metrics for sharpness enhancement

“…In a given situation, image enhancement can reach its objective by modifying IQ attributes. There are many IQ attributes used to describe the quality of an image [10], [11], such as sharpness, contrast, color, lightness, and artifacts. Sharpness is an important attribute, which usually relates to the definition of edges and visibility of details [10].…”