2014
DOI: 10.1080/17480930.2013.866791
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the chromatic contrast in open surface excavations: a comparative study between subjective and quantitative approaches

Abstract: The difficulties in the quantification of various aspects of visual impacts, among them the colour contrast, have resulted in delay of the development of effective assessment methodologies for mining operations. Technological evolution in image analysis has boosted the progression of more quantitative approaches. Yet, the critical question on how close the quantitative results are to the perceived colour difference remains an open issue. This paper is one of the few efforts to bridge subjective opinions gather… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first step aims to define the characteristics of the quarry. Recent studies (Menegaki et al, 2015), have underlined the fact that observers tend to take particular notice of the chromatic contrast between the excavated area and the colour around the edge of the site and this aspect of alteration tends to vary according to the characteristics of the material being quarried. Hence, one of the first parameters to be quantified is the extent of the Exposed Quarried Area (EQA) which varies considerably according to the position of the receptor (i.e., the viewpoint) and the choice of the exploitation method.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first step aims to define the characteristics of the quarry. Recent studies (Menegaki et al, 2015), have underlined the fact that observers tend to take particular notice of the chromatic contrast between the excavated area and the colour around the edge of the site and this aspect of alteration tends to vary according to the characteristics of the material being quarried. Hence, one of the first parameters to be quantified is the extent of the Exposed Quarried Area (EQA) which varies considerably according to the position of the receptor (i.e., the viewpoint) and the choice of the exploitation method.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore one or more comparison surfaces need to be selected in order to quantify the degree of chromatic contrast (Dentoni et al 2004). Recent studies confirmed that people tend to compare the exposed excavation with the adjacent area, instead that with the sky or with more distant areas (Menegaki et al 2014).…”
Section: The LVI Indicatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indirect methods are based on the quantification of a number of measurable variables that characterize the landscape modification (Pinzari and Re 1990;Pinto et al 2002;Misthos and Menegaki 2016). With specific reference to the visual impact produced by surface excavation, Menegaki et al (2014) performed a comparative analysis between direct and indirect methods. The current trend is the use of psychophysical criteria, where the two approaches are integrated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%