2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-33614-1_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Image Analysis Based on Heterogeneous Architectures for Precision Agriculture: A Systematic Literature Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
3
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, despite the several advantages of A4.0 and precision techniques, few reviews of the literature have been carried out on PA and A4.0, such as the work of Pusdá-Chulde et al [29] who reviewed heterogeneous architectures for PA, and Klerkx et al [30] who performed the review of social science on digital agriculture. Despite these comprehensive studies, no literature or bibliometric reviews have been carried out to review empirical results and understand the impact of technological adoption as well as the main challenges and trends for the coffee sector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite the several advantages of A4.0 and precision techniques, few reviews of the literature have been carried out on PA and A4.0, such as the work of Pusdá-Chulde et al [29] who reviewed heterogeneous architectures for PA, and Klerkx et al [30] who performed the review of social science on digital agriculture. Despite these comprehensive studies, no literature or bibliometric reviews have been carried out to review empirical results and understand the impact of technological adoption as well as the main challenges and trends for the coffee sector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like other systematic literature and scoping reviews [17][18][19][20], and following the PRISMA guidelines [21], the review methodology has focused on databases, to which the authors have access, such as SpringerLink, IEEEXplore, MDPI (Institute for Multidisciplinary Digital Publication), Scopus, and ACM (Association for Computing Machinery), and consisted of four steps: (i) research questions, (ii) document search, (iii) paper selection, and (iv) data extraction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, field-based sensors are widely adopted for automatic tree identification, such as Visible-Near-Infrared imaging [10,11], stereo imaging [12,13] and thermal imaging [14,15]. Target extraction based on RGB (Red Green Blue) digital cameras has seen a wide application in precision farming due to its low cost and non-contact data collecting [16][17][18]. In this process, color index-based segmentation techniques are mostly applied to complete the crucial background removal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%