2017
DOI: 10.1080/1745039x.2017.1312832
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ileal endogenous losses in pigs feeding a protein-free diet or diets with different contents of casein or crystalline amino acids

Abstract: The common usage of protein-free diets to estimate unspecific AA losses has been criticised as unphysiological and incorrect. Therefore, in this study different diets were tested for the determination of endogenous losses (EL) of amino acids (AA) and nitrogen (N) assuming a complete absorption in the small intestine. Seven cannulated gilts received a protein-free diet (Diet PF) or diets with 3%, 6% or 10% crude protein (CP) from crystalline AA (Diets CA) or casein (Diets CAS) according to a 7 × 7 Latin square … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analyzed concentration of CP and AA in casein agreed with the values in previous reports (Cervantes-Pahm and Stein, 2010;NRC, 2012;Brestenský et al, 2017). The analyzed concentrations of CP and AA in DDGS were also within the range of values suggested in previous studies (Urriola et al, 2009;Kim et al, 2012;Kiarie et al, 2013;Xue et al, 2014), except for Arg and Lys, which were greater than the previously reported values.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The analyzed concentration of CP and AA in casein agreed with the values in previous reports (Cervantes-Pahm and Stein, 2010;NRC, 2012;Brestenský et al, 2017). The analyzed concentrations of CP and AA in DDGS were also within the range of values suggested in previous studies (Urriola et al, 2009;Kim et al, 2012;Kiarie et al, 2013;Xue et al, 2014), except for Arg and Lys, which were greater than the previously reported values.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%