2019
DOI: 10.1007/jhep10(2019)169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IIB flux non-commutativity and the global structure of field theories

Abstract: We discuss the origin of the choice of global structure for six dimensional (2, 0) theories and their compactifications in terms of their realization from IIB string theory on ALE spaces. We find that the ambiguity in the choice of global structure on the field theory side can be traced back to a subtle effect that needs to be taken into account when specifying boundary conditions at infinity in the IIB orbifold, namely the known non-commutativity of RR fluxes in spaces with torsion. As an example, we show how… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
190
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(195 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
(359 reference statements)
5
190
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As there are no known Lagrangian descriptions of most T [g, g ] SCFTs (with the exception of some cases; we will come back to these momentarily) it might seem hard to find the 1-form symmetries for these theories using purely field theoretical tools. However, as we explain below -extending previous results [22,[31][32][33] to the four dimensional setting -there is a way of rephrasing the results from the IIB analysis in purely field theoretical terms. We find that the role played by the unscreened part of the center of the gauge group 7 in the analysis in [34] is played in the non-Lagrangian setting in this paper by Tor(coker Q), with Q the BPS quiver for the theory [49,50].…”
Section: Jhep10(2020)056mentioning
confidence: 63%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As there are no known Lagrangian descriptions of most T [g, g ] SCFTs (with the exception of some cases; we will come back to these momentarily) it might seem hard to find the 1-form symmetries for these theories using purely field theoretical tools. However, as we explain below -extending previous results [22,[31][32][33] to the four dimensional setting -there is a way of rephrasing the results from the IIB analysis in purely field theoretical terms. We find that the role played by the unscreened part of the center of the gauge group 7 in the analysis in [34] is played in the non-Lagrangian setting in this paper by Tor(coker Q), with Q the BPS quiver for the theory [49,50].…”
Section: Jhep10(2020)056mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The local degrees of freedom of T [g, g ] are in this way fully determined by the choice of geometry, but in presence of a nontrivial defect group at the horizon of the IIB compactification, extra information is required to fully specify the theory and its partition function on M 4 [31] -see also [22,32,33]. The most well known example of this fact is the case of the N = 4 theory with simple ADE algebra g corresponding to IIB on T 2 × C 2 /Γ g .…”
Section: Jhep10(2020)056mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It should be interesting apply the results of [17][18][19], like the relation between the twisted character of the chiral algebra and the Lens space index, in order to reproduce the lattices and the S-duality structure obtained in [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. Also the results of [29], investigating the geometric origin of the global properties from the 6d N = (1, 0) perspective, may be useful for the study of N = 2 models. of pair of paths connecting each pair on nodes with opposite orientation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%