1957
DOI: 10.1093/jaoac/40.1.628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

II. Tests On Replicate Samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1958
1958
1958
1958

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A.C. to ensure greater uniformity of testing, and that such work should then be followed by a survey of genuine herd milks designed to arrive at a more reliable and realistic mean A-value. Unfortunately, this course has not been adopted, and the survey (54,55,56) has been carried out without elimination of discrepancies between the results of the collaborating laboratories. As shown in the second part of the survey report (55), replication between laboratories was poor, and this makes it difficult to interpret the results for 1627 herd milks (mean A: 0-543° C.) which, taken at their face value, imply that there are marked regional differences throughout the U.S.A.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A.C. to ensure greater uniformity of testing, and that such work should then be followed by a survey of genuine herd milks designed to arrive at a more reliable and realistic mean A-value. Unfortunately, this course has not been adopted, and the survey (54,55,56) has been carried out without elimination of discrepancies between the results of the collaborating laboratories. As shown in the second part of the survey report (55), replication between laboratories was poor, and this makes it difficult to interpret the results for 1627 herd milks (mean A: 0-543° C.) which, taken at their face value, imply that there are marked regional differences throughout the U.S.A.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, this course has not been adopted, and the survey (54,55,56) has been carried out without elimination of discrepancies between the results of the collaborating laboratories. As shown in the second part of the survey report (55), replication between laboratories was poor, and this makes it difficult to interpret the results for 1627 herd milks (mean A: 0-543° C.) which, taken at their face value, imply that there are marked regional differences throughout the U.S.A. Whether these differences are of sufficient magnitude to consider regional standards of interpretation, as has been suggested, can hardly be decided before more precise results come to hand.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%