1970
DOI: 10.1080/00039896.1970.10667193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

II. Consumption of Infected Raw Milk by Human Volunteers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Drinking contaminated milk has induced seroconversion in human volunteers without clinical signs [13,83], but none of them presented aggravating risk factors. However some studies have reported clinical disease linked to the ingestion of cheese [41,54], but these results are sometimes contested since it is difficult to guarantee even for prisoners that the patients did not inhale contaminated dust or aerosols.…”
Section: Zoonotic Aspectmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Drinking contaminated milk has induced seroconversion in human volunteers without clinical signs [13,83], but none of them presented aggravating risk factors. However some studies have reported clinical disease linked to the ingestion of cheese [41,54], but these results are sometimes contested since it is difficult to guarantee even for prisoners that the patients did not inhale contaminated dust or aerosols.…”
Section: Zoonotic Aspectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C. burnetii is able to infect more than 40 species of ticks but their role in the transmission of the disease seems to be variable according to the country [82,89,104,150]. In France, this principally concerns wild and seldom concerns farm animals [83]. Ticks transmit the agent via a bite or feces to birds, rodents and ruminants [86].…”
Section: Zoonotic Aspectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Asymptomatic seroconversion and infection were noted in inmates fed raw milk from a Q fever infected herd (33). In another study, volunteers who drank naturally infected unpasteurized milk did not develop symptoms or an immunologic response to suggest infection (34). These authors suggest that the lack of seroconversion in their study may have been related to exposure to a different Coxiella strain than the one that caused infection in the inmate population (33,34).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…In another study, volunteers who drank naturally infected unpasteurized milk did not develop symptoms or an immunologic response to suggest infection (34). These authors suggest that the lack of seroconversion in their study may have been related to exposure to a different Coxiella strain than the one that caused infection in the inmate population (33,34). Pasteurization will effectively kill Coxiella in raw milk (35).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The previous experiments performed by Benson et al (3) revealed that a person who consumed raw milk had higher rates of Q fever antibodies than a person from the control group. On the other hand, the results obtained by Krumbiegel and Wiśniewski (22) did not indicate seroconversion or clinical illness in a group of humans who consumed infected raw milk. Opposite results were described by Beck and Bell (2) who reported that 32% of 300 Q fever cases in Los Angeles were detected in people who consumed raw milk.…”
Section: Coxiella Burnetii In Dairy Products and Human Risk Of Infectionmentioning
confidence: 57%