1995
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.131.1.43
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IgM autoantibodies to 180- and 230- to 240-kd human epidermal proteins in pregnancy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A maternal response to paternal antigens 21 and an association with sex hormones have also been suggested 22 , 23 but not substantiated. In addition, some studies have demonstrated circulating anti‐BMZ IgM autoantibodies 24 –26 . However, unlike in PG, IMF and autoantibody screens are negative and there are no known HLA associations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A maternal response to paternal antigens 21 and an association with sex hormones have also been suggested 22 , 23 but not substantiated. In addition, some studies have demonstrated circulating anti‐BMZ IgM autoantibodies 24 –26 . However, unlike in PG, IMF and autoantibody screens are negative and there are no known HLA associations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the DIF was clearly positive with anti‐IgM antibodies. This has been described frequently in the literature and suggests a weak IgM autoreactivity of pregnancy against epidermal proteins 11 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Moreover, only IEM permits study of the immune deposit location on structural components such as the interkeratinocytic desmosomes and the DEJ. The more important immuno‐ultrastructural data, as well as the corresponding target antigens, have been included in Table 1 6–17 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 19 Equivalent dilutions of patient and control sera were tested against keratinocyte extracts by immunoblotting (IB), as described in detail elsewhere 19 ,. 20 Extracts were subjected to sodium dodecyl sulphate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, then transferred electrophoretically to nitrocellulose and stained by the peroxidase method. Sera were tested at a dilution of 1 : 10 in washing buffer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%