2009 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference 2009
DOI: 10.1109/wcnc.2009.4917742
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IEEE802.16e Cell Capacity Including Mobility Management and QoS Differentiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, it will be interesting to analyze the system capacity of these networks with the AMC scheme in the future works. In [19,28,30] we completed a performance evaluation for the IEEE802.16e and HSDPA standards. We focused on the effects of the standardized AMC and code partitioning [29] schemes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, it will be interesting to analyze the system capacity of these networks with the AMC scheme in the future works. In [19,28,30] we completed a performance evaluation for the IEEE802.16e and HSDPA standards. We focused on the effects of the standardized AMC and code partitioning [29] schemes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, given the complexity of the proposed model (size of the state of the Markov chain space), we have considered all these classes into one single class, referred by ‘RT’. Several studies in the literature (like in ) have shown that managing the whole RT for UGS, rtPS and ErtPS, and NRT for nrtPS and BE, as a single class of traffic is enough to guarantee the QoS requirements in an efficient way. The choice of the RT traffic, such as voice and video, is made, based into that class needs a better QoS than the other classes, so more resource management and it is usually delay sensitive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%