2003
DOI: 10.1007/bf02947120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IEEE 802.11 Distributed Coordination Function: Enhancement and analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been several subsequent studies that refine the model of [2] or consider different traffic models, channel conditions, or performance measures (e.g., [20], [21]). To the best of our knowledge, our work is the first theoretical analysis of the IEEE 802.11 MAC under adversarial jamming.…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There have been several subsequent studies that refine the model of [2] or consider different traffic models, channel conditions, or performance measures (e.g., [20], [21]). To the best of our knowledge, our work is the first theoretical analysis of the IEEE 802.11 MAC under adversarial jamming.…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike [2], we adopt the protocol standard of a finite retransmission limit (this refinement of [2]'s model has been studied in [21]). Let W 0 = CW min denote the minimum contention window (CW), W i be the CW of the ith backoff stage and M be the maximum retransmission limit.…”
Section: A An Analysis Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Wang et al [6] proposed a new efficient collision resolution mechanism to reduce the collision probability by halving the contention window size after c consecutive successful transmissions. In Reference [7], an enhancement for DCF was proposed to augment the saturation throughput by adaptively adjusting the contention window.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…* The channel probing sequence [1, 5, 9, 2, 6, 10, 3,7,11,4,8] is consistent with the manufacture specification [25] and is used so that two channels in the sequence would have a high probability of having APs running on them. For example, if we hear an AP on channel 1, it is more probable to have an AP on channels 5 and 9 than on channels 2 and 3.…”
Section: Active Probing Implementation: Experimental Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%