2001
DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200112150-00019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Idiopathic Scoliosis in Three Dimensions

Abstract: In thoracic idiopathic scoliosis the deformity of the spine is 3-D, but the regional deformity of each high thoracic, thoracic, or lumbar curve is almost always 2-D. The orientation in space of each 2-D plane is such that it cannot be seen in its true frontal or sagittal projection using standard frontal or sagittal radiologic views of the subject.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Spatial representation of the spine was first approached by stereophotogrammetric reconstruction in 3D, which was based on computerized identification of corresponding anatomical landmarks in different radiographic images of the same spine [78,92]. The methods based on biplanar orthogonal radiography performed such identification in coronal and sagittal radiographs [65,67,74], while the methods based on biplanar oblique or multiplanar radiography performed such identification in two or multiple oblique radiographs [4,5,23,54,90]. However, biplanar and multiplanar radiographs are often termed two-and-ahalf-dimensional (2.5D) images, since the radiographs are actually 2D, but their combination allows the extraction of 3D structural information.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Spinal Curvature In 3d Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Spatial representation of the spine was first approached by stereophotogrammetric reconstruction in 3D, which was based on computerized identification of corresponding anatomical landmarks in different radiographic images of the same spine [78,92]. The methods based on biplanar orthogonal radiography performed such identification in coronal and sagittal radiographs [65,67,74], while the methods based on biplanar oblique or multiplanar radiography performed such identification in two or multiple oblique radiographs [4,5,23,54,90]. However, biplanar and multiplanar radiographs are often termed two-and-ahalf-dimensional (2.5D) images, since the radiographs are actually 2D, but their combination allows the extraction of 3D structural information.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Spinal Curvature In 3d Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their framework for spine segmentation from CT images, Kaminsky et al [52] used spline functions because they proved appropriate to describe both the anatomical shape and the scoliotic deformations of the spine. Recently, Berthonnaud and Dimnet [10] constructed the spine curve separately in coronal and sagittal projections by computing the average Modeling with harmonic functions [26,27,48,70,90] 2, 4 RMS: 0.9 mm [48] SD: 0.9-2.0 mm [26,27] Modeling with spline functions [10,52,64,99] 2, 4 MAD: 0.8-3.4 mm [64] Modeling with polynomial functions [66,[102][103][104] [10,65,67,74]. b Modeling with mathematical functions, e.g., harmonic [26,27,48,70,90], spline [10,52,64,99] or polynomial [66,[102][103][104] functions of two spline functions that connected the anatomical landmarks on vertebral body walls.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Spinal Curvature In 3d Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without a known cause, AIS has been simply defined as a structural lateral curvature. However, the deformity is three-dimensional, which entails the coronal, sagittal and transverse planes of the spine [ 3 , 4 ]. AIS leads to significant functional disabilities, especially pulmonary impairment [ 5 , 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A question remains unanswered, whether scoliotic patients show significantly different sagittal profile from the healthy population. Here, we believe that the spine with scoliosis should be examined and assessed three-dimensionally (Perdriolle et al, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%