2022
DOI: 10.3171/2021.6.jns21925
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IDH–wild-type glioblastoma cell density and infiltration distribution influence on supramarginal resection and its impact on overall survival: a mathematical model

Abstract: OBJECTIVE Recent studies have proposed resection of the T2 FLAIR hyperintensity beyond the T1 contrast enhancement (supramarginal resection [SMR]) for IDH–wild-type glioblastoma (GBM) to further improve patients’ overall survival (OS). GBMs have significant variability in tumor cell density, distribution, and infiltration. Advanced mathematical models based on patient-specific radiographic features have provided new insights into GBM growth kinetics on two important parameters of tumor aggressiveness: prolifer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(98 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the rates of other new postoperative neurological complications (e.g., speech impairment, visual impairment, seizure, cognitive/memory status, and sensory deficits) were not significantly different among the completely resected tumors with <53.21% or ≥53.21% resection of the surrounding FLAIR abnormality. In contrast, the studies by Tripathi et al [ 10 ] and Vivas-Buitrago et al [ 43 ] identified lower optimum thresholds ranging from 10 to 20% and at 20% of an additional resection of FLAIR abnormalities surrounding the contrast-enhancing portion regarding the improvement of OS. Furthermore, the study by Vivas-Buitrago et al [ 43 ] also observed that a significant benefit with regard to PFS can be found in patients who underwent a resection of 20 to 40% of the surrounding FLAIR abnormality beyond the conventional GTR of the contrast-enhancing portion, but no significant influence has been shown in patients who underwent an additional FLAIR resection of 50% or greater.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, the rates of other new postoperative neurological complications (e.g., speech impairment, visual impairment, seizure, cognitive/memory status, and sensory deficits) were not significantly different among the completely resected tumors with <53.21% or ≥53.21% resection of the surrounding FLAIR abnormality. In contrast, the studies by Tripathi et al [ 10 ] and Vivas-Buitrago et al [ 43 ] identified lower optimum thresholds ranging from 10 to 20% and at 20% of an additional resection of FLAIR abnormalities surrounding the contrast-enhancing portion regarding the improvement of OS. Furthermore, the study by Vivas-Buitrago et al [ 43 ] also observed that a significant benefit with regard to PFS can be found in patients who underwent a resection of 20 to 40% of the surrounding FLAIR abnormality beyond the conventional GTR of the contrast-enhancing portion, but no significant influence has been shown in patients who underwent an additional FLAIR resection of 50% or greater.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Although it is known that glioma cells can be found throughout the brain, up to 80% of patients develop initial tumor recurrence in close proximity to the resection site ( (accessed on 1 February 2023)) [ 5 , 6 , 7 ]. Reasons for this might be manifold, e.g., the growth-promoting influence of peri-tumoral microenvironments, local glioma regrowth with help of functional tumor cell networks, or simply higher tumor cell density around the resection cavity [ 8 , 9 , 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies have suggested ideal average ranges of FLAIR resection ranging from 20-53% [160][161][162][163]. A more recent study by Tripathi et al [164] suggests that the ideal SMR volume for GBs depends on the physiology of the tumor, with a range of 10-29% for nodular, 10-59% for moderately diffuse, and 30-90% for highly diffuse. One retrospective analysis of 102 patients with GBs showed a statistically significant 6.06-month median overall survival improvement in SMR when compared with GTR [165].…”
Section: Surgical Options Resection Extentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The region of interest tool was used to delineate the borders of the tumor throughout all the MRI slices, and an automatic volume calculation was then performed by the software, as previously described. [12][13][14] For patients undergoing LITT, the preoperative, postoperative, and ablation volumes were obtained. For patients undergoing biopsy, only the preoperative volume was obtained.…”
Section: Volumetric Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%