2015
DOI: 10.1080/17405904.2015.1013485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ideology of ‘Here and Now'

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since that time "mediatization" has become one of the key words in the literature discussing the functioning of contemporary media and their interface with society (Agha 2011;Bennet and Entman 2001;Ekström 2001;Schulz 2004). In this process, media transform society on both the collective and individual levels, firstly, by creating a common spatiotemporal, cognitive and axiological sphere of shared experience (Hepp 2013;Kopytowska 2013Kopytowska , 2014Kopytowska , 2015Krotz 2007Krotz , 2009, and, secondly, by substituting for social activities, which previously took place face-to-face (Schulz 2004). Since September 11, the mediatization of terrorism (and the subsequent war on terror) has played a key role in constructing the threat coming from the distant other and justifying preventive actions.…”
Section: Diversity and Common Groundmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Since that time "mediatization" has become one of the key words in the literature discussing the functioning of contemporary media and their interface with society (Agha 2011;Bennet and Entman 2001;Ekström 2001;Schulz 2004). In this process, media transform society on both the collective and individual levels, firstly, by creating a common spatiotemporal, cognitive and axiological sphere of shared experience (Hepp 2013;Kopytowska 2013Kopytowska , 2014Kopytowska , 2015Krotz 2007Krotz , 2009, and, secondly, by substituting for social activities, which previously took place face-to-face (Schulz 2004). Since September 11, the mediatization of terrorism (and the subsequent war on terror) has played a key role in constructing the threat coming from the distant other and justifying preventive actions.…”
Section: Diversity and Common Groundmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Social media have expanded the global public sphere past the geospatial and territorial limits of the traditional public sphere. Kopytowska (2013Kopytowska ( , 2015Kopytowska ( a, 2015bKopytowska ( , 2015c refers to this expansion as the mediated public sphere, in which the netizens (citizens of the mediated public sphere) collaboratively construct new realities (Naseem, 2015(Naseem, , 2020Arshad-Ayaz, 2020). The anonymity, instantaneous access, and interactive nature of virtual environments make them ideal sites for the propagation of hate speech.…”
Section: Canadian Youth's Perceptions Of Hate Speech and Social Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, while acknowledging the role of the performative potential, of language in distance reduction, MPA argues that proximization not only between selected aspects of reality and the audience (representational dimension) but also between members of the audience (interpersonal dimension) is possible thanks to "technological affordances" (Hutchby, 2001) of the media (Kopytowska forthcoming). Inextricably connected with "communicative deterritorialization" (Hepp 2013: 108), the cognitive and discursive nature of the proximization process enables both co-presence and mediated experience (Kopytowska 2013(Kopytowska , 2015a(Kopytowska , 2015b(Kopytowska , 2015c(Kopytowska , 2018a(Kopytowska , 2018b, satisfying in this way the already mentioned human "compulsion for proximity" (Boden and Molotch 1994: 258, 277).…”
Section: Cyberspace Proximization and Online Incivilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These three focal points entail bringing in a number of concepts, assumptions and hypotheses from both Critical Discourse Studies and research on online communication and identity, in particular in times of threat and crisis. The Media Proximization Approach (Kopytowska 2013(Kopytowska , 2015a(Kopytowska , 2015b(Kopytowska , 2015c(Kopytowska , 2018a(Kopytowska , 2018b with notions of proximity and distance at its core will also be adopted here to explicate online incivility, along with stereotyping and discursive construction of us vs. them. Following Fairclough and Wodak (1997: 273), we work on the assumption that three broad domains of social life, namely representations of the world, social relations between people, and personal identities, are constituted discursively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%