Ideology beyond partisanship: The behavior of judges on freedom of information cases in Chile

Mediano, Andrés Pavón; Carrasco, Diego

doi:10.1016/j.giq.2019.05.007

Cited by 6 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 52 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…No doubt there are many problems with FOI laws (Lagunes & Pocasangre, 2019; Mediano & Carrasco, 2019; Phillips & Dill, 2019), from subtle obfuscation to outright abuse of process. FOI does not provide an unmitigated view of government conduct.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Freedom of Information Research and Cultural Studies: A Subterranean Affinity

Walby

Luscombe

2020

Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introducing the idea of subterranean affinity, this article explores how methodological use of Freedom of Information (FOI) requests can contribute to the field of cultural studies. Contributing to literatures on transparency and secrecy, we consider six ways that FOI requests can contribute to and extend the field of cultural studies. These six intersections entail a productive engagement with secrecy, which dissolves the typical opposition of transparency and secrecy germane to most FOI discourse. We argue it is methodologically crucial to operate in terms of a subterranean affinity to evade the visibility traps of state agencies while preventing dogmas from emerging.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Freedom of Information Research and Cultural Studies: A Subterranean Affinity

Walby

Luscombe

2020

Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The analysis included initial descriptive statistics to understand the influence of political ideology on RET and decarbonization support. The political ideology variable was transformed into four categories to compare our results with previous research [ 38 ] based on ideological positions in the Chilean context [ 80 ]: the people who defined themselves as right and center right were identified as Conservatives , those who defined themselves as left and center left in terms of social integration were identified as Liberals , self-reported apolitical and independent voters were grouped as Independents, and those who defined themselves as in the center were identified as Moderates .…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%