Hyperrealistic Jurisprudence: The Digital Age and the (Un)Certainty of Judge Analytics

Ferreira, Daniel; Gromova, Elizaveta

doi:10.1007/s11196-023-10015-0

Cited by 7 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 47 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The paper assesses the benefits and drawbacks of hyperrealism using a systemic, comparative, and multidisciplinary approach, and it makes the case for the necessity of regulatory measures to enhance justice and reduce rights abuses. It suggests regulating forensic analysis ethically, standardizing procedures, and employing expert review [12] . Explores the ways in which artificial intelligence (AI) might help constitutional democracy [13] .…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Artificial intelligence for legal system: Jurisprudence in the digital age

Ramachandran,

Rana

2024

Int. J. Adv. Acad. Stud.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The research examines the profound influence of artificial intelligence (AI) on the legal system, with a particular emphasis on its capacity to reconfigure jurisprudence in the era of digitalization. We analyse the direct, mediator, and moderator effects of AI integration on various facets of the legal system by employing a mixed-methods approach and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with SPSS and AMOS. Our analysis begins by examining the direct effects of AI integration on critical variables such as efficacy, decision-making processes, and case outcomes within the legal domain. Following this, a mediator analysis is conducted to ascertain potential mediating factors that may exist between the integration of artificial intelligence and legal outcomes. Moderator analysis is then conducted to gain insight into the contextual factors that exert an influence on this relationship. This study seeks to enhance comprehension of the increasingly significant impact of AI on the development of law by illuminating the complex interconnections between AI technologies and jurisprudence.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Artificial intelligence for legal system: Jurisprudence in the digital age

Ramachandran,

Rana

2024

Int. J. Adv. Acad. Stud.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The article uses a systemic, comparative, and interdisciplinary analysis to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of hyperrealism, suggesting the need for regulatory mechanisms to improve justice and minimize rights violations. It proposes using expert evaluation, standardization, and ethical regulation of forensic analysis [13] .…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

AI-driven jurisprudence: Navigating legal landscapes in the digital age

Ramachandran,

Rana

2024

Int. J. Law Justice Jurisprudence

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper conducts a thorough investigation into the profound ramifications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on legal proceedings and the justice system. It assesses how these technologies are reshaping existing legal structures and principles by fundamentally altering judicial practices. Looking ahead, the paper anticipates a promising trajectory for AI in legal research, elucidating their developmental pathways and introducing novel areas of inquiry. It emphasizes the necessity of an interdisciplinary approach, advocating for collaboration between legal professionals, data scientists, and ethicists to effectively address the ethical and practical challenges inherent in the integration of AI with the law. This synergy is deemed essential for navigating the complexities of ethics and practice that arise from the intersection of AI and the legal domain. Moreover, the research underscores the pivotal roles played by AI, and related technologies, asserting that they transcend mere instrumental functions to become catalysts for comprehensive transformations in legal research methodologies. By embracing these technologies, the legal field stands on the brink of a substantial transformation, heralding the end of traditional practices and the dawn of a new era characterized by digital-age legal research paradigms.

show abstract

Manner Matters: Linguistic Equity Through a Court Interpreter in Australia

2024

Int J Semiot Law

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Linguistic equity through an interpreter is not merely a fundamental human right but also an integral part of procedural justice. As codified in the professional code of conduct, interpreters should faithfully interpret everything that has been said in the exact same manner as the original speakers. Much has been researched about the content. Little has been known about the interpretations of the manner. Drawing on one hundred questionnaire responses, this article examines the interpreters’ awareness of the manner of speech in Australian virtual courts and remote interpreting settings. The results suggest a general lack of understanding of the manner of speech, as reflected by interpreters’ inadequate knowledge of definitions and specific types of manner-related features. Furthermore, the insufficient understanding of the manner of speech impacts the interpreters’ perceptions of the manner of speech in the original utterances, and their views of the faithful reproduction of the se feature in courtroom discursive practices. The qualitative and quantitative analyses of written responses provided by professional interpreters provide insights into the practical aspects of reproducing the manner of speech in court.

show abstract

Hyperrealistic Jurisprudence: The Digital Age and the (Un)Certainty of Judge Analytics

Cited by 7 publications

References 47 publications

Artificial intelligence for legal system: Jurisprudence in the digital age

Artificial intelligence for legal system: Jurisprudence in the digital age

AI-driven jurisprudence: Navigating legal landscapes in the digital age

Manner Matters: Linguistic Equity Through a Court Interpreter in Australia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About