2011
DOI: 10.1080/00167223.2011.10669532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identity through Urban Nomenclature: Eight Central European Cities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Toponyms that arose as a result of decommunization were classified according to a number of criteria. The employed taxonomy is similar to those used in papers of Bucher et al (2013) and Stiperski et al (2015). First, they distinguished toponyms of local, regional, national and international scale; second, the set of street names was classified into basic groups: personalities, geographical names, historical events/ institutions, craft and trade, and the other toponyms.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Toponyms that arose as a result of decommunization were classified according to a number of criteria. The employed taxonomy is similar to those used in papers of Bucher et al (2013) and Stiperski et al (2015). First, they distinguished toponyms of local, regional, national and international scale; second, the set of street names was classified into basic groups: personalities, geographical names, historical events/ institutions, craft and trade, and the other toponyms.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The official factor must be stressed, since identities articulated by political elites are not necessarily the same as in the general population; however, with time, new names may become generally accepted: the political elite decides by whom or by which institution or social events streets will be named, but there is not always a compromise between the elites and the population of the city when naming certain streets. However, with time, new street names may be accepted by population (Stiperski et al 2015;Bucher et al 2013).…”
Section: Scientific Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The semantics of a large group of urbanonyms directly refers to the names of other geographical objects: cities, regions, countries, continents, etc. According to semiotic classification, used by Stiperski et al (2011) and then by Bucher et al (2013), these urban placenames are treated as geographical toponyms and include names derived from rivers, cities, regions, countries, mountains, islands, etc. Dala Costa (2020) follows the similar approach and defines such toponyms as referencing geographical places like cities, villages, countries, mountains or gorges.…”
Section: Geographical Urbanonyms and Their Role In The Symbolic Markimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This group should not be confused with so-called location urbanonyms, deriving from important sites, places and objects within the city. In the literature these two groups of urbanonyms (geographical and location) together are treated as "geography urbanonyms" (Stiperski et al 2011;Bucher et al 2013) or "topographical urbanonyms" (Gnatiuk 2018). Geographical urbanonyms may be classified based on the location of the relevant geographical objects, e.g.…”
Section: Geographical Urbanonyms and Their Role In The Symbolic Markimentioning
confidence: 99%