2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11412-011-9114-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identity presence and knowledge building: Joint emergence in online learning environments?

Abstract: This study examined the presence of identity in diverse online courses and explored how presence of identity correlated with content and students' participation in online discussion and hence knowledge building in online educational spaces. Epistemic and participation data regarding online interaction and knowledge building were collected from a diverse group of students enrolled in seven multi-disciplinary online courses. Both qualitative and quantitative findings of the study suggested that online discussion… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Undoubtedly, studies such as these focus on the different dynamics of online interaction, such as cognitive learning, argumentation, and social knowledge the cognitive and metacognitive processes of online participants, and a number of researchers (Ke et al 2011;Chang, Lin and Tsai 2012;Nandi et al 2012) have exploited this model to make sense of their students' online discussions. Although Henri's (1992) model is one of the most frequently cited and employed by CMC analysts, it was not applied in the current study: the model was designed in the context of teacher-centred instruction and it does not take the co-construction of knowledge by the interaction analysis model devised by Gunawardena et al (1997), who and comparing of information to agreement and application of newly generated including Lang (2010), Hou andWu (2011), andYang et al (2013).…”
Section: Content Analysis Coding Schemes For Online Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Undoubtedly, studies such as these focus on the different dynamics of online interaction, such as cognitive learning, argumentation, and social knowledge the cognitive and metacognitive processes of online participants, and a number of researchers (Ke et al 2011;Chang, Lin and Tsai 2012;Nandi et al 2012) have exploited this model to make sense of their students' online discussions. Although Henri's (1992) model is one of the most frequently cited and employed by CMC analysts, it was not applied in the current study: the model was designed in the context of teacher-centred instruction and it does not take the co-construction of knowledge by the interaction analysis model devised by Gunawardena et al (1997), who and comparing of information to agreement and application of newly generated including Lang (2010), Hou andWu (2011), andYang et al (2013).…”
Section: Content Analysis Coding Schemes For Online Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Convoluted terms were modified to more colloquial language, which is recommended for both the education of blind people, such as online courses. The text written in a simple and dialogic way encourages the student to understand himself in this process of learning, in which he participates as a subject of knowledge production [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A solution is to support the students' effort in establishing a social learning setting and encourage them to interact. But interaction requires knowledge of whom one is interacting with [3]. We argue that a first step towards creating a social learning setting in which interaction is central is that the students reveal cues about their identity to others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%