2019
DOI: 10.1080/13569775.2019.1611207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identity politics of the promotional videos of the European Heritage Label

Abstract: Heritage Label sites as subject positions offered for identification in this heritage discourse. Analysis shows that the subject positions are constituted by emphasis on the national level, preservation of the past for future generations and the key role of experts in the process of heritage. Although the heritage agents talk about Europe (representation) they do not identify with that as 'us'. By making the lack of 'banal Europeanness' in the videos visible the article shows the ambiguities of European identi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Political representation is much too complicated and consisting of difficult-to-define components. Political representation entails more than just leaders and the groups they support (Issn, 2022).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Political representation is much too complicated and consisting of difficult-to-define components. Political representation entails more than just leaders and the groups they support (Issn, 2022).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Underpinning this national identity is a dynamic and selective engagement with the past in which processes of remembering and forgetting help legitimate the nation state itself, its borders and sovereignty, its incumbent political elites, and the parameters of inclusion and exclusion (Gillis, 1994; Svensson, 2021). Beyond the nation state, heritage can also play a role in fostering transnational belonging, such as the promotion of pan-regional cultural heritage to advance a common ‘European’ identity across the EU (Kaasik-Krogerus, 2020) or the ways in which South African sites commemorating the Apartheid regime have been utilized to connect local suffering to the global struggle against racism and oppression (Björkdahl and Kappler, 2019). Religious heritage sites – such as mosques, temples, churches, shrines and so on – can play a similar role.…”
Section: Heritage Politics and Peacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, instead of a taken-for-granted European heritage, the EHL can be depicted as an authorization process, AHD in the making (cf. Smith 2006, 100;Kaasik-Krogerus 2019). The EHL sites are situated in the EU member states, whereas the system of meanings of what is European heritage is formed in interactions between European, national, and sometimes also local scales.…”
Section: Politics Of Mobility and Stability In Authorizing European Hmentioning
confidence: 99%