2020
DOI: 10.1088/1741-4326/ab7594
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identity of the JET M-mode and the ASDEX Upgrade I-phase phenomena

Abstract: An H-mode plasma state free of edge-localized mode (ELM), close to the L-H transition with clear density and temperature pedestal has been observed both at the Joint European Torus (JET) and at the ASDEX Upgrade (AUG) tokamaks usually identified by a low frequency (LFO, 1-2 kHz), m=1, n=0 oscillation of the magnetics and the modulation of pedestal profiles. The regime at JET is referred to as M-mode while at AUG as intermediate phase or I-phase. This contribution aims at a comparative analysis of these phenome… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(4) ETRO has distinct second harmonics in various diagnostics (figure 8), while the harmonics observed in the υ ⊥ spectrum are caused by amplitude asymmetry resulting from the different phase velocities of the IT-ET turbulence transition. (5) The magnetic component of ETRO is dominated by an m/n = 1/0 structure (figures 5 and 9), similar to the M-mode in JET and I-phase in AUG [52], but different from the typical m = 2 structure of GAM's magnetic component. ( 6) Radial propagation differs greatly among ETRO, GAM and LCO.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(4) ETRO has distinct second harmonics in various diagnostics (figure 8), while the harmonics observed in the υ ⊥ spectrum are caused by amplitude asymmetry resulting from the different phase velocities of the IT-ET turbulence transition. (5) The magnetic component of ETRO is dominated by an m/n = 1/0 structure (figures 5 and 9), similar to the M-mode in JET and I-phase in AUG [52], but different from the typical m = 2 structure of GAM's magnetic component. ( 6) Radial propagation differs greatly among ETRO, GAM and LCO.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The question now remains whether ETRO can be considered a form of LCO, a symmetric structure that arises during L-H transition [14,24,[48][49][50][51][52]. LCO also possesses harmonics and magnetic components featuring an m/n = 1/0 configuration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the L-H transition time, t LH , was determined as the time point at which the density started to rise and simultaneously the Balmer alpha line radiation, H α , (or T α in the T pulses) in the divertor dropped. At the same time the slopes of the edge temperature as well as the energy content of the plasma, W MHD rose, too, and in most of the cases an M-mode [27] (also called I-phase [28]) appeared in the very same moment. The latter makes it difficult to identify the drop of the H α signal, since the M-mode bursts can blur the signal in the time range, where the L-H transition happens.…”
Section: Experimental Strategy and Dynamics Of L-h Transition Pulsesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Further comparison to other models and scalings will be discussed in section 5. Motivated by the success of (8), the frequency of HFOs observed in JET, AUG [26], COMPASS [10] was also assembled into a database for comparison with (9). Furthermore, guided by ( 9) more detailed analysis found the HFO feature also in Globus-M. As can be seen in figure 4, the measured HFO frequency band ranges agree within order of magnitude and follow the machine size scaling ∝ 1/R predicted by the high-frequency solution (9)).…”
Section: Comparison Of the Model Predictions With Experimental Observ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly the phasing between the pressure profile relaxation and the magnetic signature is very similar. Another common feature is the observation of accompanying high-frequency oscillations (HFOs) in the range of a few ∼100 kHz observed by magnetic sensors [10,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%