2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11165-013-9391-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identity Matching to Scientists: Differences that Make a Difference?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings add to the understanding of the self-to-prototype studies. Previous studies have analysed the matching of prototypes to self, to peers, to teachers or to researchers and revealed the ideas the students hold of particular disciplines when they are not exposed to real-world representatives (Andersen et al, 2014;Hannover & Kessels, 2004;Kessels & Taconis, 2012;Taconis & Kessels, 2009). The methods used by Kessels and colleagues include written surveys with closed answers, while Andersen and colleagues combine written surveys with coding of qualitative, oral interviews.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These findings add to the understanding of the self-to-prototype studies. Previous studies have analysed the matching of prototypes to self, to peers, to teachers or to researchers and revealed the ideas the students hold of particular disciplines when they are not exposed to real-world representatives (Andersen et al, 2014;Hannover & Kessels, 2004;Kessels & Taconis, 2012;Taconis & Kessels, 2009). The methods used by Kessels and colleagues include written surveys with closed answers, while Andersen and colleagues combine written surveys with coding of qualitative, oral interviews.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were then asked to compare the different role models by labelling respectively the most and least of different characteristics such as 'collaborative' and 'healthy' and students were asked to argue which of the role models they 'could learn the most and least from' and 'would rather and rather not be in a study group with'. Items were selected based on Andersen et al (2014). Students were urged to reply to all labels to express their impression of the role models relative to each other, even if it meant that a role model could be labelled, for instance, least collaborative, while being considered collaborative by the respondent.…”
Section: Students' Conception Of Individual Role Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Losh et al (2008) encontraron una gran cantidad de representaciones en las que el sexo de los científicos mostraba un elevado grado de ambigüedad. Andersen et al (2014), utilizando entrevistas, obtuvieron que, a diferencia de la mayoría de estudios anteriores que emplearon el DAST, muchas de las opiniones que tenían los estudiantes sobre los científicos eran realistas y los rasgos estereotipados solían ser positivos, como, por ejemplo, considerar que los científicos desean descubrir nuevos conocimientos, son curiosos, lógicos y analíticos.…”
Section: Limitaciones Metodológicas Del Dastunclassified