2003
DOI: 10.1023/a:1023030805485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identity and Oppression: Differential Responses to an In‐Between Status

Abstract: Oppression operates at various levels, with varying degrees of negativity, and groups respond in markedly different ways. In this paper, the in‐between status of the colored South African group is used to illustrate issues of identity and oppression under the Apartheid system—and differing ways in which oppression was experienced and used. The colored group had many social advantages over Blacks, but were also used to oppress that group. Habituation, accommodation, and relative advantage were identified as dyn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We agree with Prilleltensky's (2003) that more action needs to be taken by community psychologists with respect to liberating oppressed groups via psycho-political education. We also agree with Sonn and Fisher (2003) that empowerment is a critical component of the liberation process. However, like Moane (2003), we respectfully suggest that education or empowerment is insufficient to affect liberation or prevention of oppression.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…We agree with Prilleltensky's (2003) that more action needs to be taken by community psychologists with respect to liberating oppressed groups via psycho-political education. We also agree with Sonn and Fisher (2003) that empowerment is a critical component of the liberation process. However, like Moane (2003), we respectfully suggest that education or empowerment is insufficient to affect liberation or prevention of oppression.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Community psychologists have drawn on various theoretical perspectives to examine experiences and processes of resistance, such as empowerment (Christens, 2012), sociopolitical development (Watts, Williams & Jagers, 2003), and liberation (Garc ıa-Ram ırez, Manuel, Paloma & Hern andezPlaza, 2011). A small but notable body of community psychology scholarship has examined various strategies for resisting dominant cultural narratives, such as the deconstruction of social myths as a central part of critical consciousness raising (Sonn & Fisher, 2003), and the telling of counter-narratives, re-imagined narratives of the self that reject the assumptions of dominant cultural narratives, and emphasize the capacity to resist and overcome oppression (Case & Hunter, 2012;McDonald et al, 2007;Rappaport, 2000). Much of this work signals the importance of identity-focused strategies for negotiating dominant cultural narratives, and points toward a broader body of scholarship on identity work (more recently referred to as narrative identity work), which is concerned with the construction and strategic use of personal and collective identity through narrative (Case & Hunter, 2014;Ibarra & Barbulescu, 2010;Snow & Anderson, 1987).…”
Section: Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sonn (2003) relatou que as pessoas reagiram de várias maneiras ao rótulo. Algumas o contestaram, dizendo que era usado com o propósito político de subjugação e fragmentação da comunidade negra, e outras o viam como inevitável e parte do sistema: "Era normal para as pessoas (serem vistas como coloureds), você nasce dentro do sistema".…”
Section: Negociando Rótulos De Identidade Impostos: Australo-sul-afriunclassified