Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2014
DOI: 10.1080/01416200.2014.984584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identity and inter religious understanding in Jewish schools in England

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dyads are not just conceptual hooks but, in keeping with the inductive character of our analytical model, reflect the processes taking place in the contexts researched. This explains why some studies that previously emerged from this research can be situated in one or more dyads: school ethos and different approaches to Muslim religion of pupils (Ipgrave 2017c;Ipgrave, Miller, and Hopkins 2010), Jewish school ethos and curricular approaches to other faiths (Ipgrave 2016), or school ethos and curriculum (Fancourt 2016).…”
Section: Discussion: a Framework Of Negotiations As Contextualisationmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The dyads are not just conceptual hooks but, in keeping with the inductive character of our analytical model, reflect the processes taking place in the contexts researched. This explains why some studies that previously emerged from this research can be situated in one or more dyads: school ethos and different approaches to Muslim religion of pupils (Ipgrave 2017c;Ipgrave, Miller, and Hopkins 2010), Jewish school ethos and curricular approaches to other faiths (Ipgrave 2016), or school ethos and curriculum (Fancourt 2016).…”
Section: Discussion: a Framework Of Negotiations As Contextualisationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We jointly led the case studies section of the Materials project (Jackson et al 2010a, 121-175), and Fancourt commented on questions of dialogue and pedagogy for both the REDCo project and the Materials project (Fancourt 2009(Fancourt , 2016. Ipgrave has been involved in and drawn on all three projects (Ipgrave 2010(Ipgrave , 2011(Ipgrave , 2012a(Ipgrave , 2012bIpgrave, Miller, and Hopkins 2010;Ipgrave 2013Ipgrave , 2016Ipgrave , 2017aIpgrave , 2017bIpgrave , 2017cIpgrave , 2017d; Arweck and Ipgrave 2017).…”
Section: The Wreru Research Traditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Catholic schools, for instance, head teachers are expected to be 'practising Catholics who set a personal example of their faith' (Fincham, 2010: 65). The same is required of the leaders of Jewish (Ipgrave, 2016) and Muslim schools (Salamun and Shah, 2012;Shah, 2012) as they strive to preserve their schools' ethos and identity at a time of increasing pressures for multiculturalism and inclusiveness.…”
Section: Leadership In Faith Schoolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shain et al's (2013: 3) research into 'DIY Judaism' ('alternative forms of Jewish engagement that bypass the established infrastructure of American Jewish life') has continued to reflect the traditional paradigm of survey-based indicators of Jewishness aimed at measuring largely communal forms of attachment, such as attendance at Jewish organisation-sponsored events, instead of intensively exploring manifestations of and motivations behind individualised forms of Jewish expression. Although Ipgrave (2016) explores young people's inter-religious experiences in a Jewish day school, she does not investigate what being Jewish means to them personally. Thus, despite some attempts to move away from 'objective' measures of Jewish identity and to focus on new spaces of Jewish involvement, research has rarely afforded individual identities significant attention.…”
Section: The Reification Of Jewish Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%