2009
DOI: 10.1093/mind/fzn153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identity and Indiscernibility

Abstract: Putative counterexamples to the Principle of Identity of Indiscernibles (PII) are notoriously inconclusive. I establish ground rules for debate in this area, offer a new response to such counterexamples for friends of the PII, but then argue that no response is entirely satisfactory. Finally, I undermine some positive arguments for PII.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
41
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…11 9 Importantly, the information encoded in the relational properties being invoked is, on the second construal, purely structural. 10 One may worry that it is more natural to think that relations ground relational properties than the other way round (see, for instance, Hawley (2009)). In that case, the argument just offered would need to be backed up by additional considerations.…”
Section: Pautz's Objectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 9 Importantly, the information encoded in the relational properties being invoked is, on the second construal, purely structural. 10 One may worry that it is more natural to think that relations ground relational properties than the other way round (see, for instance, Hawley (2009)). In that case, the argument just offered would need to be backed up by additional considerations.…”
Section: Pautz's Objectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Hawley points out [6], defenders of PII can respond to such examples in a variety of ways. First, they may query whether the described situations are possible at all-this does not appear to be a promising way out in our above examples, which all are possible according to the relevant physical laws.…”
Section: Weak Discernibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…51 French and Krause ([2006], p. 9) suggest there is a 'worry' that by apppealing to irreflexive relations we beg the question; see Hawley [2009], Section 3.2 for discussion of related points. However, and to repeat, I am here simply presenting Saunders' argument as I find it.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%