2015 IEEE 18th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems 2015
DOI: 10.1109/itsc.2015.413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying Users and Use of (Electric-) Free-Floating Carsharing in Berlin and Munich

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As has been said already, the authors see the study from Seign as a reason for transferring socio-demographic characteristics of the district to the users. This conclusion is confirmed by the findings of Mueller et al [31] who present the results of surveys from onboard units of the vehicles in which users were asked to tell the purpose of their trip: Most of the costumers use carsharing for their trip back home.…”
Section: Interpretation Of the Variables' Effectsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…As has been said already, the authors see the study from Seign as a reason for transferring socio-demographic characteristics of the district to the users. This conclusion is confirmed by the findings of Mueller et al [31] who present the results of surveys from onboard units of the vehicles in which users were asked to tell the purpose of their trip: Most of the costumers use carsharing for their trip back home.…”
Section: Interpretation Of the Variables' Effectsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…For example, in 2008, the bike sharing system Vélib' in Paris launched a discount pricing strategy [31] to motivate users to return bikes to uphill stations. A pricing strategy was developed by Chemla et al [32] to incentivize users to return bikes to the least loaded stations nearby, and a dynamic online pricing incentive strategy was proposed by Pfrommer et al [33] to motivate users to choose alternative locations to pick up or return bikes. However, depending on users' participation, user-based rebalancing may not be sufficient to achieve the system level self-rebalancing [30].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, user-based rebalancing strategies are often used as a supplement to operator-based ones. These two types of strategies can be combined to help reduce rebalancing costs [33]. Currently, most existing bike-sharing systems (e.g., Mobike and Ofo in China) employ operator-based rebalancing strategies [8].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To approximate the probability of using carsharing, we analyze the profiles of current users of carsharing, as well as characteristics of trips which are currently done by carsharing. We use data from a survey with a random sample of 1071 users of flexible carsharing in Berlin for socio-demography data and an in-car survey with 2850 recorded trips for trip characteristics ("baseline weighting") [36].…”
Section: Carsharing Usersmentioning
confidence: 99%