2016 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/pesgm.2016.7741796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying useful statistical indicators of proximity to instability in stochastic power systems

Abstract: Abstract-Prior research has shown that autocorrelation and variance in voltage measurements tend to increase as power systems approach instability. This paper seeks to identify the conditions under which these statistical indicators provide reliable early warning of instability in power systems. First, the paper derives and validates a semi-analytical method for quickly calculating the expected variance and autocorrelation of all voltages and currents in an arbitrary power system model. Building on this approa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We see that for both algorithms we don't see any clear plateau in ε(∆t) dependence even for small ∆t. This is due to the increasing with ∆t error in the first-order approximation (7) of the fine-grained dynamics and hence to the level of validity of (12). Nevertheless, we see that for both estimators ε is growing slowly with ∆t, and the error seen for ∆t = 3 cycles is very close to the one realized when the finest possible discretization ∆t = 1 is taken, although the algorithms use three times less samples in the former case.…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We see that for both algorithms we don't see any clear plateau in ε(∆t) dependence even for small ∆t. This is due to the increasing with ∆t error in the first-order approximation (7) of the fine-grained dynamics and hence to the level of validity of (12). Nevertheless, we see that for both estimators ε is growing slowly with ∆t, and the error seen for ∆t = 3 cycles is very close to the one realized when the finest possible discretization ∆t = 1 is taken, although the algorithms use three times less samples in the former case.…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 72%
“…An accurate estimation of the dynamic state matrix has a large number of applications that have been well explored in the literature [10], [11], including model validation and parameter calibration [3], [4], probing the proximity to instability and helping in design of the corresponding emergency control actions [12], [13], optimization and resource allocation [14], [15], as well as identification and analysis of forced oscillations in the system [16]. The potential ability to use the learned dynamic parameters to simultaneously perform a purely measurement-based state estimation of deviations in power consumption from nominal values represents another attractive feature of our framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum value λP 0 before the SNB occurs corresponds to the voltage stability margin. As a result, the stochastic power system model (5) can be represented by:u = G(u, p(εt)) + σBξ (14) We aim to study the impact of the intensity of the stochastic perturbation σ and the load power increasing speed ε on SNB of the model (14) and thus on the voltage stability margin of power systems.…”
Section: The Impact Of Noise On Saddle-node Bifurcationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…t ∈ R, m and p are the sample time, number of system variables and bus, respectively. The model-based stability estimators [51,52] focus on linearization of nonlinear DAEs in (1) and (2) which gives…”
Section: A Modelling Grid Data Using Large Dimensional Random Matricesmentioning
confidence: 99%