2013
DOI: 10.1057/kmrp.2012.8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying the information management process and knowledge creation in technology-based companies: a Brazilian comparative case study

Abstract: Information and knowledge have been cited over the last two decades as competitive advantage tools. Recently, the use of them has been discussed to promote innovation. The premise indicates that human interaction, information sharing and knowledge creation are vital for the success of organizations that need to constantly learn and innovate. The aim of this study is to point out contributions in a dynamic environment of acquisition, dissemination and the use of information to create subsequent knowledge, obser… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, in the relationship with the incubator manager, the intensity of his/her involvement in the start-up is a second factor, where active coaching is superior to passive in the transfer of knowledge (Clarysse and Bruneel 2007;Rice 2002). Moreover, in the relationship with other start-ups, more trust, better aligned commercial objectives and more activities organised by the incubator seem to improve the transfer of knowledge (McAdam and Marlow 2007;Oakey 2007;Patton 2014;Vick et al 2013). These contextual factors capture the considerable variation of network-based incubation.…”
Section: Reviewing the Network-based Incubation Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in the relationship with the incubator manager, the intensity of his/her involvement in the start-up is a second factor, where active coaching is superior to passive in the transfer of knowledge (Clarysse and Bruneel 2007;Rice 2002). Moreover, in the relationship with other start-ups, more trust, better aligned commercial objectives and more activities organised by the incubator seem to improve the transfer of knowledge (McAdam and Marlow 2007;Oakey 2007;Patton 2014;Vick et al 2013). These contextual factors capture the considerable variation of network-based incubation.…”
Section: Reviewing the Network-based Incubation Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incubators and parks in Brazil are relevant social and economic development drivers, similar to those in other countries (Plonski, 2016). Thus, startups acquire and exchange knowledge during the incubation period, which is crucial for their survival in the market after they exit (Phillips, 2002;Vick et al, 2013). We followed the recommendations of Dillman et al (2014) when conducting the survey questionnaire.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…His work has been widely accepted and used in many research areas such as organisational learning, new product development, information technology and management in general (Argote et al, 2003;Gourlay, 2006;Nonaka and Von Krogh, 2009;Vick et al, 2013Vick et al, , 2015. Nonaka's model includes not only KC but also knowledge transfer, which is essential to EE programmes.…”
Section: Nonaka's Knowledge Creation Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%