2013
DOI: 10.1002/bdm.1787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying the Effects of Unjustified Confidence versus Overconfidence: Lessons Learned from Two Analytic Methods

Abstract: One of the most common findings in behavioral decision research is that people have unrealistic beliefs about how much they know. However, demonstrating that misplaced confidence exists does not necessarily mean that there are costs to it. This paper contrasts two approaches toward answering whether misplaced confidence is good or bad, which we have labeled the overconfidence and unjustified confidence approach. We first consider conceptual and analytic issues distinguishing these approaches. Then, we provide … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An additional analysis examining confidence after controlling for knowledge 51 (i.e. whether one is more or less confident than his knowledge would justify) similarly failed to find any group differences ( F [4,165]=2.1, p =0.09).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…An additional analysis examining confidence after controlling for knowledge 51 (i.e. whether one is more or less confident than his knowledge would justify) similarly failed to find any group differences ( F [4,165]=2.1, p =0.09).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Although experts' decision rules are different and more accurate than those of novices (e.g., Alba & Hutchinson, 1987Hansen & Helgeson, 1996;Hauser, Dong & Ding, 2014;Newell et al, 2004), the findings in behavioural decision research suggest that people have unrealistic beliefs about how much they know and tend to overestimate their knowledge and ability in many different domains (Parker & Stone, 2014).…”
Section: Knowledge Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See Parker and Stone (2014) and Parker et al (2012) for further discussion of confidence and overconfidence issues. The primary purpose of this study was to assess the financial capability of U.S. adults and provide baseline results that could be tracked over time.…”
Section: Dataset and Questionnairementioning
confidence: 99%