2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-93034-3_52
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying Singleton Spammers via Spammer Group Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apart from these, there exist specific models [55]- [60] as well which combine rating information with other behavioral footprints to detect spam reviewers [61]- [65]. Recently, many works have been reported in literature for detection of individual [66]- [68] as well as spammer groups using unsupervised learning [69]- [77], semi-supervised learning [56], [59], supervised learning [78]- [82] as well as hybrid learning [83]. Escalante et al [84] have emphasized on early detection of deception using profile based representations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from these, there exist specific models [55]- [60] as well which combine rating information with other behavioral footprints to detect spam reviewers [61]- [65]. Recently, many works have been reported in literature for detection of individual [66]- [68] as well as spammer groups using unsupervised learning [69]- [77], semi-supervised learning [56], [59], supervised learning [78]- [82] as well as hybrid learning [83]. Escalante et al [84] have emphasized on early detection of deception using profile based representations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%