2017
DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-006411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying patient and practice characteristics associated with patient-reported experiences of safety problems and harm: a cross-sectional study using a multilevel modelling approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Many of the questions from these domains were not concerned with contributory factors to safety incidents but rather outcomes of safety incidents (eg, ‘the diagnosis or treatment plan recommended by my doctor, nurse or other health professional was right for me’) or actions patients took to prevent safety incidents (eg, ‘I feel I cannot speak up about certain things with health professionals at the practice’ (negatively worded)). These items need to be considered further about their potential value and use in primary care practice 52…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of the questions from these domains were not concerned with contributory factors to safety incidents but rather outcomes of safety incidents (eg, ‘the diagnosis or treatment plan recommended by my doctor, nurse or other health professional was right for me’) or actions patients took to prevent safety incidents (eg, ‘I feel I cannot speak up about certain things with health professionals at the practice’ (negatively worded)). These items need to be considered further about their potential value and use in primary care practice 52…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previous study with 1190 patients registered in 45 practices did not show any association between multimorbidity and polypharmacy and selected PREOS-PC scores in a regression model with patient and practice activation as independent variables and adjusted for a range of clinical and sociodemographic characteristics, but not gender, as it was not statistically significantly associated with the dependent variables in bivariate analyses [43].…”
Section: Discussion Of Main Findings and Comparison With The Previous Literaturementioning
confidence: 64%
“…Las principales fortalezas del estudio son el uso de un cuestionario validado y fiable 13 , 16 , el elevado tamaño muestral y el uso de estimadores robustos para evaluar la SP en AP 17 . Además, el uso de métodos mixtos permite ofrecer una mayor comprensión del objeto de estudio, reforzando y ampliando los resultados obtenidos en el análisis cuantitativo 18 .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified