Identifying obstacles encountered at different stages of the disaster management cycle (DMC) and its implications for rural flooding in Pakistan

Abstract

The world has seen a number of natural hazards, but among them, floods are perhaps the most frequent devastating natural hazard, resulting in more human causalities and financial losses. Rural inundation has become an issue of concern in various parts of the world, including Pakistan. Over the past few decades, it has been hard for local institutions and rural populations to recover from the trauma inflicted by these events. The disaster risk management cycle is a well-known tool for coping with disasters and their consequences. Yet, the DRM cycle efficacy has been questioned in various rural settings. Thus, this paper applied a programmatic strategy to understand the challenges disaster management authorities and communities face in managing flood risks through the conventional disaster management cycle in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province, Pakistan. The study objective was accomplished by using both qualitative and exploratory research designs. Four communities (namely, Peshawar, Charsadda, Nowshera, and Dera Ismail Khan) with a historical record of flooding were chosen for focus group discussion (32 in total) using a purposive sampling method. Additionally, 31 key informant interviews were undertaken from pertinent local disaster risk management institutions. We employed a thematic analysis to classify responses and obstacles into the various stages of the disaster management cycle. The findings of this study from interviews and focus groups provided some new insight into the conventional DRM cycle. The issues and challenges encountered by institutions and the community members were divided into four stages: 1-mitigation, 2-preparedness, 3-rescue and relief (R&R), and 4-rehabilitation and recovery (R&R). Based on the findings, it seems that local disaster management institutions still rely on reactive strategies and deal with flood hazards on an ad hoc basis. Poor governance and a lack of responses for present development trajectories were also highlighted as reasons why flood risk management is still challenging. There is an urgent need to perform susceptibility and risk assessments for multiple hazards and develop specialized plans that follow disaster risk reduction principles and adaptation to climate change. This study recommends incorporating resilience and adaptation to climate change into the current disaster management cycle to prevent or reduce future hazards and risks in rural areas.

Assessment of School Teacher's Disaster Preparedness by Using Comprehensive School Safety Framework

“…The National Disaster Management Authority(NDMA) leads the effort, implementing policies like the National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Plan, promoting community participation, and collaborating with international organizations for technical expertise and financial support (Hussain et al, 2023). The Pakistani Government has enacted a law to strengthen disaster risk reduction (DRRM) in response to the Second World Conference on Disaster Reduction's Hyogo Framework for Action (HFA), a 10-year plan aimed at enhancing disaster resiliency and promoting safety through education and innovation (Shah et al, 2023). The law includes provisions for the establishment of a national disaster management authority, which will coordinate and implement DRRM efforts across the country.…”

Sociological Trilogy of Cultural Community on Exposure Peril of Monsoon in Western Rural and Urban, Sierra Leone

“…Further than frequently and in the previous, diminutive or no substantial correlating exposure assuagement evaluations have been recommended, affixed to slender government capability and other structured deficiencies. Consequently, accomplishing cultural community accustomed exposure reaction systems become one concrete rural and urban recourse (Shah, 2023).…”

GIS-based flood susceptibility mapping using bivariate statistical model in Swat River Basin, Eastern Hindukush region, Pakistan

“…Pakistan is among the worst climate change-affected countries, experiencing extreme hydrometeorological events (Bhatti et al, 2020;Abbas et al, 2022;Baqa et al, 2022). The recent catastrophic flooding events are the eye-witness of climate change in Pakistan (Khan I. et al, 2022a;Shah et al, 2023). The country has witnessed approximately 25 devastating floods between 1950 and 2020 that killed more than 9,088 people with a total estimated loss of 20 billion USD (Khan et al, 2021;Ahmed et al, 2023).…”

“…The recent catastrophic flooding events are the eye-witness of climate change in Pakistan (Khan I. et al, 2022a;Shah et al, 2023). The country has witnessed approximately 25 devastating floods between 1950 and 2020 that killed more than 9,088 people with a total estimated loss of 20 billion USD (Khan et al, 2021;Ahmed et al, 2023). Pakistan was struck by one of the most devastating floods in its history in 2010 due to brutal monsoon precipitation that caused substantial damages across the country (Gaurav et al, 2011;Khan et al, 2016;Farooq et al, 2019), affecting around 20 million people in 78 districts, and killed 1,985 people causing an estimated 9.7 billion USD loss to Pakistan's economy (F. Ahmed et al, 2023).…”

“…In 2012, heavy monsoon rains triggered floods in major parts of the country, including the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Upper Sindh, Southern Punjab, and Balochistan provinces (Saeed et al, 2021;Shah et al, 2023). Following these devastating flooding events, the country was struck by catastrophic flash flooding in August 2013 (Butt et al, 2020).…”