2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2012.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying Major Hemorrhage with Automated Data: Results of the Veterans Affairs Study to Improve Anticoagulation (VARIA)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…16 Events were retained if they occurred while a patient was receiving warfarin, as described above, and fulfilled at least one of four conditions: 1) Associated with death within 30 days; 2) Associated with blood transfusion; 3) Associated with bleeding into a critical anatomic site; or 4) Cited as the main reason for a hospitalization. 16 Approximately 16 % of candidate events were retained as "major hemorrhages" by this definition, although this percentage was much higher for events likely to be severe (e.g. diverticula of colon, 46 %).…”
Section: Dependent Variable: Major Hemorrhagic Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Events were retained if they occurred while a patient was receiving warfarin, as described above, and fulfilled at least one of four conditions: 1) Associated with death within 30 days; 2) Associated with blood transfusion; 3) Associated with bleeding into a critical anatomic site; or 4) Cited as the main reason for a hospitalization. 16 Approximately 16 % of candidate events were retained as "major hemorrhages" by this definition, although this percentage was much higher for events likely to be severe (e.g. diverticula of colon, 46 %).…”
Section: Dependent Variable: Major Hemorrhagic Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because our method of categorization differed from other studies 31 , direct comparison of studies might be difficult. While our algorithm 30 for identifying major hemorrhage had face validity, it clearly could not be as precise as a chart review. Moreover, we lacked the data power to identify new thromboembolic events, which could have been contrasted with bleeding rates to better evaluate the overall risk and benefit of warfarin therapy.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We used data from the Veterans AffaiRs Study to Improve Anticoagulation (VARIA), 17,19 which included patients receiving warfarin therapy from the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) between October 1, 2006 and September 30,2008. To eliminate the complexities uniquely associated with therapy initiation, we only included data from the 103,897 "experienced" warfarin users, who had been on warfarin for at least 6 months (Table 1).…”
Section: Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations