2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying environmental and management factors that may be associated with the quality of life of kennelled dogs (Canis familiaris)

Abstract: Please cite this article as: Kiddie, J.L., Collins, L.M.,Identifying environmental and management factors that may be associated with the quality of life of kennelled dogs (Canis familiaris), Applied Animal Behaviour Science (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim. 2015.03.007 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Only one animal (D9) had a negative LQ score at the final assessment, thus, between the two assessments performed by A1, the negative LQ scores decreased by 25%. The mean score (0.477) obtained by Kiddie and Collins (2015) in England for dogs sheltered for a long time, subjected to a socialization programme during six days is higher than the mean score obtained in our study by A1 after performing the socialization programme. Yet, the same authors (Kiddie and Collins, 2014) suggest that the LQ score was developed as an indicator meant to monitor the life quality of the animals over time.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…Only one animal (D9) had a negative LQ score at the final assessment, thus, between the two assessments performed by A1, the negative LQ scores decreased by 25%. The mean score (0.477) obtained by Kiddie and Collins (2015) in England for dogs sheltered for a long time, subjected to a socialization programme during six days is higher than the mean score obtained in our study by A1 after performing the socialization programme. Yet, the same authors (Kiddie and Collins, 2014) suggest that the LQ score was developed as an indicator meant to monitor the life quality of the animals over time.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…Gender differences in learning ability vary among species 25 , 41 43 , but females tend to show superior learning abilities over males 44 47 . Females dogs respond more obviously than males do to human emotions 48 , 49 . In this study, however, we did not find a significant difference in the ability to discriminate human facial expressions between female and male giant pandas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study was able to identify a number of management practices (i.e. provision of bunk beds, 30+ minutes of staff interaction, daily training, quiet environments) that significantly increased the quality of life scores of the dogs, showing that the tool can be valuable when determining which factors are important for the wellbeing of dogs in kennels (Kiddie and Collins, 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…They used this system to assess the quality of life of 202 dogs across 13 rehoming centres and found good inter-rater reliability and evidence of content validity (the assessment measured what it was designed to measure), response process validity (those conducting the assessments understood the construct in the same way), and convergent validity (similar constructs hypothesised to agree were shown to agree). In a later study, the authors used the tool to monitor the quality of life of kennelled dogs over time, as well as to assess the impact of different handling and husbandry changes (Kiddie and Collins, 2015). This study was able to identify a number of management practices (i.e.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%