2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/icra48506.2021.9561967
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying Driver Interactions via Conditional Behavior Prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nearly all work assumes an independent, per-agent output space, in which agent interactions cannot be explicitly captured. A few works are notable in describing joint interactions as output, either in an asymmetric [28,47] or symmetric way [18,35,41].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nearly all work assumes an independent, per-agent output space, in which agent interactions cannot be explicitly captured. A few works are notable in describing joint interactions as output, either in an asymmetric [28,47] or symmetric way [18,35,41].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our framework is complementary to alternative approaches for characterizing interaction, such as the interactivity score [43] (mutual information) and distribution-based KL-divergence. The Interactivity score may miss crucial interaction events: scores can be large when there is high correlation between two trajectories (e.g., one car following another), but small when trajectories are dissimilar (e.g., cars crossing an intersection).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DeCastro et al [11] construct a representation of multi-vehicle interaction outcomes based on latent parameters using a generative model. Tolstaya et al [43] propose an Interactivity score that enables the identification of interesting interactive scenarios for training generative models. Our work is similar in spirit and complementary to this latter line of work.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is because passive prediction models ignore the fact that the autonomous agent's future actions can influence other agents' behavior. To this end, researchers started to investigate a more coherent interactive prediction and planning framework which relies on predicting the surrounding agents' future trajectories conditioned on the ego agent's future actions [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]. Under such frameworks, the autonomous agents can reason over potential actions while considering their influence on surrounding agents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More interestingly, some existing works formulated an alternative prediction task to evaluate the prediction module in a self-contained way [9], [8], [11]. We follow [11] to refer to this task as conditional behavior prediction (CBP).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%