Identifying complications of interventional procedures from UK routine healthcare databases: a systematic search for methods using clinical codes

Abstract

BackgroundSeveral authors have developed and applied methods to routine data sets to identify the nature and rate of complications following interventional procedures. But, to date, there has been no systematic search for such methods. The objective of this article was to find, classify and appraise published methods, based on analysis of clinical codes, which used routine healthcare databases in a United Kingdom setting to identify complications resulting from interventional procedures.MethodsA literature search strategy was developed to identify published studies that referred, in the title or abstract, to the name or acronym of a known routine healthcare database and to complications from procedures or devices. The following data sources were searched in February and March 2013: Cochrane Methods Register, Conference Proceedings Citation Index – Science, Econlit, EMBASE, Health Management Information Consortium, Health Technology Assessment database, MathSciNet, MEDLINE, MEDLINE in-process, OAIster, OpenGrey, Science Citation Index Expanded and ScienceDirect. Of the eligible papers, those which reported methods using clinical coding were classified and summarised in tabular form using the following headings: routine healthcare database; medical speciality; method for identifying complications; length of follow-up; method of recording comorbidity. The benefits and limitations of each approach were assessed.ResultsFrom 3688 papers identified from the literature search, 44 reported the use of clinical codes to identify complications, from which four distinct methods were identified: 1) searching the index admission for specified clinical codes, 2) searching a sequence of admissions for specified clinical codes, 3) searching for specified clinical codes for complications from procedures and devices within the International Classification of Diseases 10th revision (ICD-10) coding scheme which is the methodology recommended by NHS Classification Service, and 4) conducting manual clinical review of diagnostic and procedure codes.ConclusionsThe four distinct methods identifying complication from codified data offer great potential in generating new evidence on the quality and safety of new procedures using routine data. However the most robust method, using the methodology recommended by the NHS Classification Service, was the least frequently used, highlighting that much valuable observational data is being ignored.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2288-14-126) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Complications following vaginal mesh procedures for stress urinary incontinence: an 8 year study of 92,246 women

“…Furthermore the presence of diagnostic codes for infection or pain were not necessarily due to a previous mesh insertion. In summary our methods were more specific, but perhaps less sensitive than that applied by the Scottish Inquiry, with our study providing a more conservative but robust estimate of long-term complications 31 .…”

Quantifying severe urinary complications after radical prostatectomy: the development and validation of a surgical performance indicator using hospital administrative data

“…Second, the use of procedure codes ensured only complications severe enough to require hospital‐based treatments were captured. In this way, we avoided ‘overestimation’ of the complication rate, a recognized problem when diagnosis codes are used for this purpose .…”

“…By contrast to the present study, these studies did not provide a transparent coding framework, nor did they assess the validity of this outcome as a performance indicator. Earlier studies carried out in the USA , Canada and England used diagnosis codes solely or in combination with procedure codes, which may lead, as indicated above, to overestimation of the complication rates .…”

Procedural and short-term safety of bronchial thermoplasty in clinical practice: evidence from a national registry and Hospital Episode Statistics

“…In HES, a procedural complication was identified if the episode contained certain combinations of International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) codes [27].…”