2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00918.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying Childhood Age Groups for Exposure Assessments and Monitoring

Abstract: The purpose of this article is to describe a standard set of age groups for exposure assessors to consider when assessing childhood exposure and potential dose to environmental contaminants. In addition, this article presents examples to show how the age groups can be applied in children's exposure assessments. A consistent set of childhood age groups, supported by an underlying scientific rationale, will improve the accuracy and comparability of exposure and risk assessments for children. The effort was under… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Wilcoxon-rank sum test was applied to determine if there were significant differences between the age groupings at the first node of the tree and the Kruskal-Wallis test for comparison across the groups was applied to assess for significant differences by age over the whole tree. The Kruskal-Wallis test for comparison across the groups was also used to determine if there were significant differences among the US EPA age groups for the entire cohort aged 1-12-years old (US EPA, 2005;Firestone et al, 2007).…”
Section: Quantification Of Contact Activity Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Wilcoxon-rank sum test was applied to determine if there were significant differences between the age groupings at the first node of the tree and the Kruskal-Wallis test for comparison across the groups was applied to assess for significant differences by age over the whole tree. The Kruskal-Wallis test for comparison across the groups was also used to determine if there were significant differences among the US EPA age groups for the entire cohort aged 1-12-years old (US EPA, 2005;Firestone et al, 2007).…”
Section: Quantification Of Contact Activity Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These exposure-prone behaviors may change as children age from infants to toddlers, to older children and ultimately to adults. To account for these differences, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) recommends that the following age groups be used when conducting exposure and risk assessments in children: from birth to o1 month, from 1 to o3 months, from 3 to o6 months, from 6 to o12 months, from 1 to o2 years, from 2 to o3 years, from 3 to o6 years, from 6 to o11 years, from 11 to o16 years and from 16 to o21 years (US EPA, 2005;Firestone et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[5][6][7][8][9][10] Os metais pesados são potenciais riscos para a saúde humana se limites seguros de exposição ou absorção são excedidos. 11 A exposição a metais representa uma ameaça significativa para a saúde das crianças em seu desenvolvimento comportamental e intelectual. 12 …”
Section: 2unclassified
“…Age was categorized into groups: 4 to 5 years, 6 to 9 years and 10 to 17 years. 16 We categorized children on the basis of their symptoms at baseline as resembling the symptoms of functional dyspepsia, irritable bowel syndrome, or functional abdominal pain. Symptoms of these FGIDs were defi ned by the Rome III criteria irrespective of the duration of symptoms (Supplemental Appendix 1, available at http:// annfammed.org/content/11/3/238/suppl/DC1).…”
Section: Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%