2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2014.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying cheese whey an adulterant in milk: Limited contribution of a sensometric approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To identify natural variation among consumers in the product acceptance test, the variables were not subject to any pre-processing of data. The PLS model quality was evaluated by 2 parameters: coefficient of determination (R 2 ), related to the variation in the dependent variable explained by the regression model, and the cumulative index (Q 2 ), which measures the global contribution of the first components as to predictive quality of the model (Donadini et al, 2012;Aquino et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To identify natural variation among consumers in the product acceptance test, the variables were not subject to any pre-processing of data. The PLS model quality was evaluated by 2 parameters: coefficient of determination (R 2 ), related to the variation in the dependent variable explained by the regression model, and the cumulative index (Q 2 ), which measures the global contribution of the first components as to predictive quality of the model (Donadini et al, 2012;Aquino et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The product factor indicated that the panel was highly discriminant ( p < .005) in the eight attributes, as evaluated with an effectiveness in discrimination of 100%. This result indicated that all attributes could remain in the analyses and had potential relevance for the discrimination of adulterated cheese with varying concentrations of vegetal fat (Aquino et al, ). The p values for panelists indicate consensus ( p > .05) in how panelists evaluated the attributes, except for WHC, POR, RAS, and RAA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For panel performance evaluation, the data were collected in a matrix of dimensions ( J * M*I) K , where J = 5 cheeses, M = 3 repetitions , I = 8 panelists, and K = 8 attributes. Panel performance was assessed using the following mixed model of two‐way ANOVA with interactions: Yiks=normalμ+αi+βk+αβik+eiks where Y iks represented the result from panelist i for the product k ; μ is the overall mean; α i is the panelist effect (random); β k is product effect (fixed); αβ ik product per panelist interaction; and e ijk is the error term of the model with e iks ≈ N (͂0, σ 2 ) (Aquino et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the dairy market faces problems related to quality and safety of raw milk (RM) because of adulteration by adding substances with lower economic and nutritional value often occurs. Recently published studies indicate that milk is one of the most common foods involved in fraud occurrences (Aquino et al 2014Carvalho et al 2007). Minas Frescal cheese waste whey (MFCW) is a waste from Minas Frescal cheese production whose disposal is an issue of increasing importance (Carvalho et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%