1980
DOI: 10.1021/es60161a010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying and estimating the relative importance of sources of airborne particulates

Abstract: This study was funded by grants from the Electric Power Research Institute (Grant No. RP439-1) and the American Petroleum Institute, and is part of a Center Program supported by Grant No.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 9 hsts the results. The motor-vehicle primary-part~culate contribution to urban-air particulate mass is -11% (-9 pg/m3) on the average, in reasonable agreement with other estimates (e.g., 11%; Larsen, 1966), 18% (Larsen, 1966;Conlee et al, 1967;Hammerle and Pierson, 1975), 8"/,-23% (Kleinman -et al, 1980). The urban-air species most influenced by primary vehicle particulate matter are, in order, Br, Pb, H, C, Ba, Mn, Sr, Mg, Ca, C1, I, and P.Al1 of the rest are broadly comparable, with only minimal (0%4%) vehicle contributions.…”
Section: Contribution Of Vehicles To Urban Air Particulate Concentratsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Table 9 hsts the results. The motor-vehicle primary-part~culate contribution to urban-air particulate mass is -11% (-9 pg/m3) on the average, in reasonable agreement with other estimates (e.g., 11%; Larsen, 1966), 18% (Larsen, 1966;Conlee et al, 1967;Hammerle and Pierson, 1975), 8"/,-23% (Kleinman -et al, 1980). The urban-air species most influenced by primary vehicle particulate matter are, in order, Br, Pb, H, C, Ba, Mn, Sr, Mg, Ca, C1, I, and P.Al1 of the rest are broadly comparable, with only minimal (0%4%) vehicle contributions.…”
Section: Contribution Of Vehicles To Urban Air Particulate Concentratsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…28 -30 Multivariable regression models have been used in the past to apportion particulate matter to various sources using tracer species. 20,31 Although these models have been shown to agree well with other receptor models, 21 they are not widely used today, because the source-profile-based multivariate models, which were briefly mentioned above, have become more popular.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a CMB can be used in both long-term synoptic studies and short-term intensive studies, they are difficult to employ due to the information required about sources and their characterization. CMBs have been used quite successfully to apportion specific sources of atmospheric particulate matter (Dzubay et al, 1988;Kao and Friedlander, 1995;Kleinman et al, 1980;Kowalczyk et al, 1982;Lewis et al, 1986;Morandi et al, 1987;Pratsinis et al, 1988;Tuncel et al, 1985). However, they are not as applicable to sources of organic contaminants due to the atmospheric lability of many SOCs.…”
Section: Source Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%