2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identify the key emission sources for mitigating ozone pollution: A case study of urban area in the Yangtze River Delta region, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with the proportion of each source in concentration analysis, the proportion of fossil fuel combustion, industrial emissions and gasoline evaporation increased, indicating that the VOCs emitted from the above three sources had higher reactivity. Comprehensive analysis emphasizes the critical need for prioritizing control strategies that target VOC emissions from gasoline vehicles and diesel engines (trucks, off-road machinery and inland vessels) for effective O 3 pollution mitigation, which is similar to the findings of other studies [27,50,51]. Additionally, controlling the VOC sources from solvent use and gasoline evaporation, which are characterized by minimal NO X contributions, can provide additional environmental benefits beyond O 3 mitigation.…”
Section: Source Analysis Of Vocssupporting
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Compared with the proportion of each source in concentration analysis, the proportion of fossil fuel combustion, industrial emissions and gasoline evaporation increased, indicating that the VOCs emitted from the above three sources had higher reactivity. Comprehensive analysis emphasizes the critical need for prioritizing control strategies that target VOC emissions from gasoline vehicles and diesel engines (trucks, off-road machinery and inland vessels) for effective O 3 pollution mitigation, which is similar to the findings of other studies [27,50,51]. Additionally, controlling the VOC sources from solvent use and gasoline evaporation, which are characterized by minimal NO X contributions, can provide additional environmental benefits beyond O 3 mitigation.…”
Section: Source Analysis Of Vocssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…The contributions of biogenic emissions and diesel engine exhaust to VOCs ranked in the second and third positions (18.1% and 16.5%), followed by industrial emissions (14.7%). The relatively high vegetation coverage in the demonstration area contributed to the higher biogenic VOC contribution compared to the Suzhou average [27]. Solvent use, gasoline evaporation and fossil fuel combustion exhibited similar contributions, ranging from 9.7% to 10.2%.…”
Section: Source Analysis Of Vocsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For VOC, the response of O 3 to VOC in the YRD increased from 0.1 µg m −3 in 2011 to 1.5 µg m −3 in 2020. This may be related to the isotropic feedback of O 3 pollution on VOC in the YRD [66][67][68]. VOC emissions in the YRD increased from 2011 to 2020 and were relatively higher than that in 2010 (shown in Figure S10), and the response value of O 3 pollution to VOC was positive and increased from 2011 to 2020.…”
Section: Pm 25 and O 3 Collaborative Pollution Response To Each Precu...mentioning
confidence: 94%