2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of viscoelastic properties of Dacron aortic grafts subjected to physiological pulsatile flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, this strategy can not be used for the valve leaflets since the model is the real prosthesis (λ = λ m and E = E m ) that, however, is subjected to different hydrodynamic loads. Similar problems occur if the prosthesis is the aortic wall itself as it is usually a Dacron (polyethylene terephthalate; PET) vascular graft with a complex fabric structure (figure 18a) aimed at reproducing the orthotropic mechanical properties of the natural tissue (Amabili et al 2020). It must be noted, however, that the Dacron fibre is quite rigid and, for the physiological pressure differences, the stretching is very limited; considering the negligible inertia of the graft with respect to that of the fluid therein, the flow motion turns out to be well reproduced by the experiment even if the internal loads of the structure are not representative of the real problem.…”
Section: Heart Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, this strategy can not be used for the valve leaflets since the model is the real prosthesis (λ = λ m and E = E m ) that, however, is subjected to different hydrodynamic loads. Similar problems occur if the prosthesis is the aortic wall itself as it is usually a Dacron (polyethylene terephthalate; PET) vascular graft with a complex fabric structure (figure 18a) aimed at reproducing the orthotropic mechanical properties of the natural tissue (Amabili et al 2020). It must be noted, however, that the Dacron fibre is quite rigid and, for the physiological pressure differences, the stretching is very limited; considering the negligible inertia of the graft with respect to that of the fluid therein, the flow motion turns out to be well reproduced by the experiment even if the internal loads of the structure are not representative of the real problem.…”
Section: Heart Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This enables active adjustments to pressure waveforms and variations in compliance. In another MCL setup with Windkessel chambers, they tested descending aortas 21 and Dacron aortic grafts 38 , 39 in separate studies to examine diameter‐based compliance in different HRs with precise pressure waveforms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These properties are known to be time-dependent and were not measured due to the lack of a suggested method by the ISO 7198 standard. However, a review of the literature indicated that stress relaxation and viscoelastic recovery are meaningful, as demonstrated by Amabili et al [58], who underscored the significance of cyclic axisymmetric diameter alterations acquired under physiological pulsatile conditions. Studies have shown that Dacron grafts are noticeably stiffer around their circumference than the aortic vessels they replace, resulting in a significant mechanical mismatch between the grafts and the native tissue.…”
Section: Tensile Properties Of Films and Tubesmentioning
confidence: 99%