“…Especially in forensic cases of prolonged fires with temperatures above 700°C, dental analysis stands alone as other materials used as primary (fingerprints and DNA) or secondary means of identification (e.g., clothing) are often destroyed (Fairgrieve, 2008;Hill et al, 2011a,b). Currently, comparative dental identification is the most reliable and frequently applied identification method in cases involving high-temperature exposure (Bernstein, 1998;Jablonski and Shum, 1989;Lain et al, 2011;Savio et al, 2006). Posterior teeth tend to be better preserved than anterior teeth due to their size and the heat protection, offered by the tongue, layers of skin, mucosa, muscle and adipose tissue, and are therefore more likely to be used in the odontological identification process (Berketa, 2013).…”