2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.02.068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of the Parameters of a Concrete Damage Material Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This mechanism is one of the most popular and has been widely used in ABAQUS to simulate realistic concrete behaviour. It was found that this mechanism can represent closely to the actual crack pattern as seen in previous studies [32][33][34][35]. The Eq.…”
Section: Steel and Prestressed Steel Tendonsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This mechanism is one of the most popular and has been widely used in ABAQUS to simulate realistic concrete behaviour. It was found that this mechanism can represent closely to the actual crack pattern as seen in previous studies [32][33][34][35]. The Eq.…”
Section: Steel and Prestressed Steel Tendonsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…However, it is impossible to conduct 102 a crack propagation analysis with the CDP models as the CDP concept does not employ a failure 103 criterion. The CDP is one of the most popular concrete models and has been used for concrete 104 behaviour simulation in ABAQUS as seen in the literature [32][33][34][35]. This model was theoretically 105 described by Lubliner et al [32] and developed by Lee and Fenves [33] To enable the study of crack propagation of the sleeper models under impact loading, an alternative, the brittle cracking model, has been suggested [36][37].…”
Section: Finite Element Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another aspect of modelling is a coordinate system, imperfection of local and global section, residual stresses and boundary conditions. However, the accuracy of FEM is greatly considered by the parameters input, in particular by selecting a suitable material property and its constitutive model [3,50].…”
Section: Finite Element Model Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical solutions using mathematical models created in the finite element method (FEM) comprise a turnout superstructure and substructure including structural layers. The 3D models are demanding in terms of boundary conditions (loads and bonds) modelling and parameters definition [1]. It is necessary to use suitable material models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%