2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.01.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of system damping in railway catenary wire systems from full-scale measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To reproduce the realistic defects of catenary, the contact wire irregularities [12], [13], dropper defect [14] and wear [15] are included in the assessment of current collection quality. To ensure the accuracy of simulation results, the measurement data from field tests are utilised to modify [16] and validate [17], [18] the numerical models. The hardware-in-the-loop technique has been widely developed to couple a mimic catenary and realistic pantograph [19], which provide more convincing measured results to analyse the pantograph behaviour.…”
Section: B Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reproduce the realistic defects of catenary, the contact wire irregularities [12], [13], dropper defect [14] and wear [15] are included in the assessment of current collection quality. To ensure the accuracy of simulation results, the measurement data from field tests are utilised to modify [16] and validate [17], [18] the numerical models. The hardware-in-the-loop technique has been widely developed to couple a mimic catenary and realistic pantograph [19], which provide more convincing measured results to analyse the pantograph behaviour.…”
Section: B Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that all of the damping ratios only correspond to the first frequency component in the signals, as shown in Figure 16 . The damping ratios of catenary sections exhibited larger variation with the geometric structure, and also exhibited obvious differences with different measurement distances [ 22 ]. From Table 5 , it is evident that larger damping ratios occur for larger distances, and the damping ratios change nonlinearly with the change of distances to the excitation position.…”
Section: Validation Through a Field Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, there are two main methods for pantograph–catenary condition measurement: Non-contact methods based on image processing and contact-type schemes based on sensors installed in the system. In previous years, contact-type schemes have been widely used in railway condition detection, such as contact force collection [ 20 , 21 ] and acceleration collection [ 22 , 23 ]. However, these approaches require parts of the measurement system to be installed on the catenary structure, which means that the railway traffic will be interrupted and measurement will take a more substantial amount of time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hardware-in-the-loop hybrid simulations of pantographcatenary interaction is also another approach to find improved dynamic performance for the two systems [20,21]. Also, research on the identification and influence of catenary damping, shown as very important for the interaction quality [22], was performed to improve catenary models [23]. The pantograph-catenary benchmarks, [24,25], and its associated references portrait the state-of-the-art of existing numerical analysis tools, developed by world leading research institutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%