1997
DOI: 10.1109/16.585555
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of stress-induced leakage current components and the corresponding trap models in SiO/sub 2/ films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on previous reports, we should consider several possible mechanisms to explain this NDR observed around the quasibreakdown spots. As reported by Sakakibara et al, 22 one possible explanation is energy level matching between the Fermi level of the gate material in MOS devices and the defect level in the oxide layer, such as dangling bond states positioned at the midgap of the oxide. 23 However, in our STM experiments, the electrons were not emitted from a semiconductor gate having a band gap, but from the metal STM tip ͓Fig.…”
Section: Characterization Of Individual Current Leakage Sites By Umentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Based on previous reports, we should consider several possible mechanisms to explain this NDR observed around the quasibreakdown spots. As reported by Sakakibara et al, 22 one possible explanation is energy level matching between the Fermi level of the gate material in MOS devices and the defect level in the oxide layer, such as dangling bond states positioned at the midgap of the oxide. 23 However, in our STM experiments, the electrons were not emitted from a semiconductor gate having a band gap, but from the metal STM tip ͓Fig.…”
Section: Characterization Of Individual Current Leakage Sites By Umentioning
confidence: 76%
“…This bond picture also explains the TAT SILCs which contain both dc and transient components [343,355]. The tunnel charge-discharge properties of the traps is explained by this band diagram [45,334,337,344,354,356,668]. Both the positively charged trap and the negatively charged trap have Coulombic cross-sections of mid-10" 13 cm 2 [457,531,593].…”
Section: Oxide Trap Generationmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…2,3) Although it appears that radiation hardness improves considerably as gate oxide becomes thinner, 4,5) it has been found that ionizing radiation can still cause substantial radiation-induced leakage current (RILC) in thin gate oxides. [6][7][8][9] The RILC is similar to the well-known electrical-stress-induced leakage current (SILC), [10][11][12][13] which is a major concern for the reliability of MOS devices with thin gate oxide films. 14,15) Thus, the understanding and control of radiation-induced damages in silicon devices are imperative to the successful implementation of XRL technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%