1993
DOI: 10.1037/1040-3590.5.3.307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of special education needs with the Personality Inventory for Children (PIC): A hierarchical classification model.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, Zelko (1991) assessed the relative contributions of three parent-completed behavior rating scales in identification of ADHD, psychiatric, and normal boys, and determined that multidimensional scales are preferable for clinical diagnostic purposes. Another approach applied by Kline, Lachar, and Boersma (1993) using the parent-completed Personality Inventory for Children (PIC; Wirt, Lachar, Klinedinst, & Seat, 1984) combined discriminant function analyses (DFA) and profiles of LD, SED, or mentally impaired youths to identify PIC scales contributing to group discrimination. A set of six hierarchical classification rules derived from DFA were developed, and cross validation indicated 90% accuracy in regular versus special education classifications, but only about 50% accuracy for specific problems (LD vs. SED).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Zelko (1991) assessed the relative contributions of three parent-completed behavior rating scales in identification of ADHD, psychiatric, and normal boys, and determined that multidimensional scales are preferable for clinical diagnostic purposes. Another approach applied by Kline, Lachar, and Boersma (1993) using the parent-completed Personality Inventory for Children (PIC; Wirt, Lachar, Klinedinst, & Seat, 1984) combined discriminant function analyses (DFA) and profiles of LD, SED, or mentally impaired youths to identify PIC scales contributing to group discrimination. A set of six hierarchical classification rules derived from DFA were developed, and cross validation indicated 90% accuracy in regular versus special education classifications, but only about 50% accuracy for specific problems (LD vs. SED).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CDATA[& Darliuk, in press; Lufi et al, 2004; Paget CDATA[& Reynolds, 1984). Additionally, Sideridis et al (2006) pointed to the fact that psychopathology accounted for significant amounts of variability in achievement, compared to several cognitive and metacognitive variables.Based on the above, we suggest that classification studies are needed for at least three reasons: (a) because the identification criteria of the disorder have been questioned of the presence of comorbid characteristics (e.g.,Kline et al, 1993), which often are stronger predictors of LD-related outcomes than those from cognitive variables. Expanding the taxonomy of LD characteristics may be particularly important for the development of interventions that target both academic and nonacademic (e.g., social) outcomes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identifikasi merupakan kegiatan penjaringan, sedangkan asessmen merupakan penyaringan. Kegiatan penyaringan tidak dapat dilakukan jika tahapan penjaringan tidak dilakukan (Kline et al, 1994): (Kline et al, 1993). Maka dari itu tahapan paling awal yang harus dilakukan sebelum asessmen adalah melakukan identifikasi.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified